Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McGhee v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1405 Hearing dates: 23 and 24 February 2023 and 28 April 2023 Date of orders: 27 July 2023 Decision date: 27 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Espinosa C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development application No DA2021/1734 for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a dwelling house and associated landscaping works at 21 Headland Road, North Curl Curl legally described as Lot 107 in DP6143 is determined by granting consent to the application subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits are retained.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – residential development – demolition – construction of new dwelling – reasonable view sharing – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties –- orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.7
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, ss 14E, 14F
Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011
Cases Cited: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council (2004) 134 LGERA 23; [2004] NSWLEC 140
Ridley v The Owners Strata Plan No 60662 [2011] NSWLEC 1107
Texts Cited: Warringah Development Control Plan 2012
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas Michael David McGhee (First Applicant)
Carmen Maureen McGhee (Second Applicant)
Norther Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
F Berglund (Applicant)
C Gough (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Addisons (Applicant)
Storey and Gough (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/303118 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is a Class 1 Development Appeal pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) being an appeal against the refusal of development application DA2021/1734 for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a dwelling house and associated landscaping works (the Proposed Development) at 21 Headland Road, North Curl Curl legally described as Lot 107 in DP6143 (the Site).
-
This case is about views and whether the Proposed Development will result in reasonable view sharing between the Site and the property at 20 Headland Road, North Curl Curl (the Property) in accordance with the planning principle set out in Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council (2004) 134 LGERA 23; [2004] NSWLEC 140 (Tenacity). It is agreed that the Proposed Development does not have any additional impact other than the impact on the views from the Property.
-
The Site and the Property are located opposite each other on Headland Road, North Curl Curl where the Site is located to the south and down hill from the Property. In the Statement of Environmental Effects filed with the Class 1 Application, at page 21, the Site is described as having “approx. 2m fall from front to rear”.
-
The Property’s southern boundary fronts onto Headland Road and currently enjoys a number of views, but the view that will be impacted by the Proposed Development is part of the panoramic southern view from the Property, namely, from its…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read McGhee v Northern Beaches Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] NSWLEC 1405
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court were primarily concerned with the scope of review under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) and whether the Council's decision was lawful, reasonable, and based on relevant considerations. McGhee argued that the Council had failed to properly consider relevant environmental and planning policies and had applied an incorrect legal test in reaching its decision.
The Court found that the Council had indeed erred in its application of the legal test and in its consideration of the relevant planning policies. The Court held that the Council had applied a stricter standard of proof than required by law and had failed to adequately consider McGhee's evidence and submissions. The Court also found that the Council's decision was not supported by the evidence and was therefore unreasonable. Accordingly, the Court granted the appeal, set aside the Council's decision, and substituted its own decision granting consent for the development application subject to specified conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development application No DA2021/1734 for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a dwelling house and associated landscaping works at 21 Headland Road, North Curl Curl legally described as Lot 107 in DP6143 is determined by granting consent to the application subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits are retained.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.