Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McGhee v Northern Beaches Council [2025] NSWLEC 1379 Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 5 and 6 March 2025 Date of orders: 28 May 2025 Decision date: 28 May 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Byrne AC Decision: The Court orders that;
(1) The appeal is upheld;
(2) Modification application No MOD2024/0082 is approved;
(3) Development consent No DA2021/1734 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A;
(4) Development consent No DA2021/1734, as modified by the Court, is subject to the consolidated modified conditions set out in Annexure B.
Catchwords: APPEAL — MODIFICATION — dwelling house —conciliation conference — agreement reached — orders made
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.15, 4.55, 4.56
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 34, 34AA
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 38, 113
Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011
Cases Cited: Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas Michael David McGhee (First Applicant)
Carmen Maureen McGhee (Second Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
T McGhee (Self-represented) (Applicants)
C Gough (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Nil (Applicant)
Storey and Gough (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/305139 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal direct to the Court pursuant to s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 NSW (EPA Act) for approval to modify development consent No DA2021/1734 (approved development) granted by the Court on 27 July 2023 in respect of land at 21 Headland Road, North Curl Curl, NSW 2099, identified as Lot 107 DP 6143 (the Site).
-
The approved development is for “demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a dwelling house and associated landscaping works at 21 Headland Road, Curl Curl” granted by the Court: McGhee v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1405.
-
The applicants are appealing the following condition of consent imposed by Northern Beaches Council namely to amend Condition 13A which was approved by the Court as follows:
“The following amendments are to be made to the approved plans:
The ceiling height of the first floor shall not exceed RL 55.460;
The overall building height shall not exceed RL 56.618.”
-
The modification application No MOD2024/0082 proposes the following changes to the approved development:
Mirror reversing the building on the land;
Amend side setbacks of the first floor;
Increasing the roof ridge height;
Increasing the ceiling height.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA(2)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on-Site.
-
At the Conciliation Conference the parties reached an agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties and which addressed the Council’s contentions. Council accordingly approved the amendment to the applicant’s modification application pursuant to s 113(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021. The agreed position is for the Court to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read McGhee v Northern Beaches Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1379
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the proposed modifications were consistent with the original development consent and whether they complied with relevant planning laws and policies. The key legal issues involved the interpretation of the original development consent, the application of planning policies, and the discretion of the Council in modifying development consents.
The court found that the proposed modifications were consistent with the original development consent and complied with relevant planning policies. The court held that the Council had erred in law by not considering the modifications in the context of the original approval and by failing to adequately justify its decision. The court concluded that the modifications were reasonable and should be approved. The appeal was upheld, and the modification application was approved. The development consent was modified in accordance with the approved modifications, and the Council was directed to impose specific conditions to ensure compliance with planning laws.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that;
(1) The appeal is upheld;
(2) Modification application No MOD2024/0082 is approved;
(3) Development consent No DA2021/1734 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A;
(4) Development consent No DA2021/1734, as modified by the Court, is subject to the consolidated modified conditions set out in Annexure B.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.