Legal Research
Cases
Maringido v Blurlato

Maringido v Blurlato

Case [2024] VSC 766

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Maringido v Blurlato [2024] VSC 766
Case: [2024] VSC 766
Decision Date: 11 December 2024

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Maringido v Blurlato [2024] VSC 766

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Bird v DP (a pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…ction in the general law between employment relationships and other relationships remains vital in various fields today.[100] [100]See, eg, Bird v DP [2024] HCA 41.…
Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 1124
Citation 2

…[44]And see now Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 1124; compare Uber BV & ors v Aslam & ors [2021] UKSC 5.…
Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187 [97]–[100]; A & L Windows v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46 [29]–[31]; Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59 [23]–[25].…
Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…lticultural and Indigenous Affairs ; Ex Parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 19 [25] (Gleeson CJ); MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2022) 273 CLR 506; Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 276 CLR 80.…
A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…016) 51 VR 95, 129 [118]–[120]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187 [97]–[100]; A & L Windows v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46 [29]–[31]; Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59 [23]–[25].…
Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…80, 501, especially at [54]–[55]; Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 129 [118]–[120]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187 [97]–[100]; A & L Windows v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46 [29]–[31]; Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59 [23]–[25].…
Mackenzie v Head, Transport for Victoria [2021] VSCA 100
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…the written material that was before the Medical Panel. That material appears in the Court Book. [32]See McKenzie v Head, Transport for Victoria [2021] VSCA 100 [153].…
Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315
Citation 8 (Para 1)

…as are significant cases for present purposes, as I will further indicate in due course. [22]CB 182–191. [23](2016) 51 VR 95. [24][2019] VSCA 315 at 52.…
Chang v Neill [2019] VSCA 151
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…an aspect of its duty to avoid legal unreasonableness.[82] [81] Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 131 [126]. [82]Compare Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174.…
Karabinis v Bendrups [2018] VSCA 124
Citation 10 (Para 44)

…[86] Karabinis v Bendrups [2018] VSCA 124 at [44]–[48].…
Harris v DJD Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 188
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…e in substance with the plaintiff in that regard. [2]The plaintiff relies mainly on the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95 in this regard.…
Richter v Driscoll [2016] VSCA 142
Citation 12 (Para 1)

…ill be seen, I agree in substance with the plaintiff in that regard. [2]The plaintiff relies mainly on the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95 in this regard.…
Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak [2013] HCA 43
Citation 13 (Para 1)

…rovide an adequate statement of reasons in compliance with s 313(2) of the WIRCA.[58] [58]See, generally, Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, 501, especially at [54]–[55]; Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 129 [118]–[120]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] V…
Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012] VSCA 232
Citation 14 (Para 1)

…which a court could grant leave to reopen was where there had been a mistaken apprehension of the law. That would cover the present case. [57][2012] 46 VR 1.…
Chandra v Webber [2010] FCA 705
Citation 15

…[33](2010) 187 FCR 31, 43 [40], citing McCormack v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 114 FCR 574 at [38]–[40] per Sackville J.…
McCormack v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 1700
Citation 16 (Para 38)

…[33](2010) 187 FCR 31, 43 [40], citing McCormack v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 114 FCR 574 at [38]–[40] per Sackville J.…
Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44
Citation 17 (Para 1)

…ta told me that he had not considered this issue.[48] He floated the idea that the Court might wish to receive submissions on it.[49] [45](2001) 207 CLR 21. [46]Transcript of Proceedings, Maringido v Blurlato (Supreme Court of Victoria, S ECI 2021 03841, Justice Cavanough, 25 October 2022) 3 (‘2022 Transcript’). [47…
RJ Brodie (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Pennell [1968] HCA 73
Citation 18

…[95](1968) 117 CLR 665.…
Mynott v Barnard [1939] HCA 13
Citation 19 (Para 1)

…ip of master and servant and the concept of a contract of service, in depth.[94] [91]The Law Book Company Ltd, 1981. [92]Ibid, 2. [93](1939) 62 CLR 68 at 91. [94]Ibid, chapter 2.…
Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5
Citation 20

…[44]And see now Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 1124; compare Uber BV & ors v Aslam & ors [2021] UKSC 5.…
Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v De Luxe Red & Yellow Cabs Co-Operative (Trading) Society Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 361
Citation 21 (Para 1)

…sengers for reward. [38] Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v De Luxe Red & Yellow Cabs Co-Operative (Trading) Society Ltd (1998) 82 FCR 507.…
CD v Central Gippsland Health Service [2022] VSC 462
Citation 22

…[53][2022] VSC 462.…
Re Kaz Nominees Pty Ltd [2019] VSC 315
Citation 23 (Para 1)

…the Medical Panel accepted that his physical restrictions would prevent him from going back to that type of work if it were heavy. [70]Ibid [27]. [71][2019] VSC 315. [72] Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [59]–[70], [73]. [73]Plaintiff’s outline of submissions dated 13 April 2022 [27].…
Moore v Tatura Milk Industries [2019] VSC 259
Citation 24 (Para 1)

…For this premise, Blurlato relies principally on the judgment of McDonald J given in 2019 in Moore v Tatura Milk Industries Ltd .[88] [88][2019] VSC 259.…
Karabinis v Bendrups [2017] VSC 648
Citation 25 (Para 68)

…[85][2017] VSC 648 at [68]–[85].…
Barnett v Malios [2013] VSC 404
Citation 26

…[83][2013] VSC 404 [35].…
Calleja v Franet Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 339
Citation 27 (Para 1)

…that a statement of reasons might be inadequate in certain respects and yet disclose a reviewable error or errors.[59] [59] Calleja v Franet Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 339 [18] (Ashley J).…

AI Chat coming soon