-
Bird v DP (a pseudonym)
[2024] HCA 41
Para 1
…ction in the general law between employment relationships and other relationships remains vital in various fields today.[100] [100]See, eg, Bird v DP [2024] HCA 41.…
-
Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
[2024] NSWSC 1124
…[44]And see now Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 1124; compare Uber BV & ors v Aslam & ors [2021] UKSC 5.…
-
Grujovska v Brand
[2023] VSCA 59
Para 1
…2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187 [97]–[100]; A & L Windows v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46 [29]–[31]; Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59 [23]–[25].…
-
CD v Central Gippsland Health Service
[2022] VSC 462
…[53][2022] VSC 462.…
-
Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs
[2022] HCA 26
Para 1
…lticultural and Indigenous Affairs ; Ex Parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 19 [25] (Gleeson CJ); MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2022) 273 CLR 506; Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 276 CLR 80.…
-
A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim
[2022] VSCA 46
Para 1
…016) 51 VR 95, 129 [118]–[120]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187 [97]–[100]; A & L Windows v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46 [29]–[31]; Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59 [23]–[25].…
-
Sidiqi v Kotsios
[2021] VSCA 187
Para 1
…80, 501, especially at [54]–[55]; Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 129 [118]–[120]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187 [97]–[100]; A & L Windows v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46 [29]–[31]; Grujovska v Brand [2023] VSCA 59 [23]–[25].…
-
Mackenzie v Head, Transport for Victoria
[2021] VSCA 100
Para 1
…the written material that was before the Medical Panel. That material appears in the Court Book. [32]See McKenzie v Head, Transport for Victoria [2021] VSCA 100 [153].…
-
Uber BV v Aslam
[2021] UKSC 5
…[44]And see now Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 1124; compare Uber BV & ors v Aslam & ors [2021] UKSC 5.…
-
Dundar v Bas
[2019] VSCA 315
Para 1
…as are significant cases for present purposes, as I will further indicate in due course. [22]CB 182–191. [23](2016) 51 VR 95. [24][2019] VSCA 315 at 52.…
-
Chang v Neill
[2019] VSCA 151
Para 1
…an aspect of its duty to avoid legal unreasonableness.[82] [81] Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 131 [126]. [82]Compare Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174.…
-
Re Kaz Nominees Pty Ltd
[2019] VSC 315
Para 1
…the Medical Panel accepted that his physical restrictions would prevent him from going back to that type of work if it were heavy. [70]Ibid [27]. [71][2019] VSC 315. [72] Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [59]–[70], [73]. [73]Plaintiff’s outline of submissions dated 13 April 2022 [27].…
-
Moore v Tatura Milk Industries
[2019] VSC 259
Para 1
…For this premise, Blurlato relies principally on the judgment of McDonald J given in 2019 in Moore v Tatura Milk Industries Ltd .[88] [88][2019] VSC 259.…
-
Karabinis v Bendrups
[2018] VSCA 124
Para 44
…[86] Karabinis v Bendrups [2018] VSCA 124 at [44]–[48].…
-
Karabinis v Bendrups
[2017] VSC 648
Para 68
…[85][2017] VSC 648 at [68]–[85].…
-
Harris v DJD Earthmoving Pty Ltd
[2016] VSCA 188
Para 1
…e in substance with the plaintiff in that regard. [2]The plaintiff relies mainly on the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95 in this regard.…
-
Richter v Driscoll
[2016] VSCA 142
Para 1
…ill be seen, I agree in substance with the plaintiff in that regard. [2]The plaintiff relies mainly on the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95 in this regard.…
-
Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak
[2013] HCA 43
Para 1
…rovide an adequate statement of reasons in compliance with s 313(2) of the WIRCA.[58] [58]See, generally, Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, 501, especially at [54]–[55]; Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 129 [118]–[120]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315 [46]–[51]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] V…
-
Barnett v Malios
[2013] VSC 404
…[83][2013] VSC 404 [35].…
-
Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd
[2012] VSCA 232
Para 1
…which a court could grant leave to reopen was where there had been a mistaken apprehension of the law. That would cover the present case. [57][2012] 46 VR 1.…
-
Chandra v Webber
[2010] FCA 705
…[33](2010) 187 FCR 31, 43 [40], citing McCormack v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 114 FCR 574 at [38]–[40] per Sackville J.…
-
McCormack v Commissioner of Taxation
[2001] FCA 1700
Para 38
…[33](2010) 187 FCR 31, 43 [40], citing McCormack v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 114 FCR 574 at [38]–[40] per Sackville J.…
-
Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd
[2001] HCA 44
Para 1
…ta told me that he had not considered this issue.[48] He floated the idea that the Court might wish to receive submissions on it.[49] [45](2001) 207 CLR 21. [46]Transcript of Proceedings, Maringido v Blurlato (Supreme Court of Victoria, S ECI 2021 03841, Justice Cavanough, 25 October 2022) 3 (‘2022 Transcript’). [47…
-
Calleja v Franet Pty Ltd
[2000] VSC 339
Para 1
…that a statement of reasons might be inadequate in certain respects and yet disclose a reviewable error or errors.[59] [59] Calleja v Franet Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 339 [18] (Ashley J).…
-
Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v De Luxe Red & Yellow Cabs Co-Operative (Trading) Society Ltd & Ors
[1998] FCA 361
Para 1
…sengers for reward. [38] Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v De Luxe Red & Yellow Cabs Co-Operative (Trading) Society Ltd (1998) 82 FCR 507.…
-
RJ Brodie (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Pennell
[1968] HCA 73
…[95](1968) 117 CLR 665.…
-
Mynott v Barnard
[1939] HCA 13
Para 1
…ip of master and servant and the concept of a contract of service, in depth.[94] [91]The Law Book Company Ltd, 1981. [92]Ibid, 2. [93](1939) 62 CLR 68 at 91. [94]Ibid, chapter 2.…
-
Papaconstantinou
[2021] VSCA 145
Para 1
…efined in s 325 of the Act.[5] [5]For an explanation of this statutory regime, see e.g., Victorian Workcover Authority v Papaconstantinou [2021] VSCA 145 [1]–[10], [58]–[60].…