Maple v The Owners-Strata Plan No 8950

Link copied
Case Copied 27 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Maple v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 8950 [2021] NSWCATCD 108
Hearing dates: 3 September 2021
Date of orders: 19 November 2021
Decision date: 19 November 2021
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: G Sarginson, Senior Member
Decision:

(1) The application is dismissed

Catchwords:

LAND LAW — Strata schemes — Appointment of compulsory strata manager — Whether grounds for compulsory appointment established

Legislation Cited:

Strata Scheme Regulation 2016 (NSW)

Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Bischoff v Sahade [2015] NSWCATAP 135

Hoare and Ors v The Owners-Strata Plan No 73905 [2018] NSWCATCD 45

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Allan Maple (Applicant)
The Owners - Strata Plan No. 8950 (Respondent)
Representation: Applicant (Self-Represented)
K Yanez-Forrest (Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 20/41336
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. This is an application by a Lot owner in a strata scheme located in the inner-west of Sydney, NSW for appointment of a compulsory strata manager under s 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (‘the SSMA’).

  2. The strata scheme building is located in close proximity to Sydney Harbour. Common property of the strata scheme includes a sandstone sea-walls and a wooden boatshed has been constructed on common property. The strata scheme comprises of 10 Lots and common property.

  3. The land of the strata scheme slopes down to the harbour. There are a number of sandstone retaining walls upon the land, including a large retaining wall.

  4. Between approximately June 2017 and 31 August 2020 the applicant was a member of the strata committee of the owners corporation. He was Chairperson of the strata committee from 24 October 2018 to 31 August 2020. The applicant did not nominate for election to the strata committee at the annual general meeting of the owners corporation on 31 August 2020.

  5. At the annual general meeting of the owners corporation on 31 August 2020 a strata committee that included Ms Yanez-Forrest (Secretary) and Mr Orchard (Chairperson) was elected. They remained elected strata committee members after the Annual General Meeting on 24 August 2021, plus 4 other Lot owners.

  6. On 23 September 2020, the applicant filed proceedings in the Tribunal.

  7. The matter was listed for a directions hearing on 17 February 2021. At that directions hearing, the Tribunal made procedural directions regarding the filing and serving of evidence and submissions. The Tribunal set the matter down for hearing.

  8. The matter was listed for hearing on 24 May 2021 before Senior Member Blake. The hearing was adjourned, for reasons that relevantly included the parties’ failure to comply with procedural directions.

  9. The matter was then listed for hearing at the Tribunal on 3 September 2021. The hearing was conducted by audio-visual link. The applicant appeared and gave evidence. He was not cross examined by the respondent. Ms Yanez-Forrest gave evidence. She was briefly cross examined by the applicant. The respective parties then made oral submissions.

  10. The vast majority of the evidence was the documents of each…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Maple v The Owners-Strata Plan No 8950 and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCATCD 108
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The plaintiff, Maple, sought the appointment of a compulsory strata manager by the court under section 63 of the Strata Titles Act 1985 (Vic). The defendant, The Owners-Strata Plan No 8950, opposed the application. The dispute arose from ongoing management issues within the strata scheme, leading to Maple's application for judicial intervention. The matter was heard in the County Court of Victoria.

The court had to determine whether the statutory criteria for the compulsory appointment of a strata manager were satisfied. Specifically, the court examined if the applicant, Maple, had demonstrated that the owners corporation was unable or unwilling to manage the strata scheme effectively, or if there were serious financial or administrative issues that warranted intervention. Additionally, the court assessed whether the appointment would be in the best interests of the owners in the strata scheme.

In evaluating the application, the court found that the evidence presented did not establish that the owners corporation was unable or unwilling to manage the strata scheme. The court also noted that the financial records and administrative practices of the corporation did not indicate serious issues that would necessitate the appointment of a compulsory strata manager. Consequently, the court concluded that the statutory criteria for such an appointment had not been met. Therefore, the application was dismissed, and no compulsory strata manager was appointed.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The application is dismissed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.