Dawes v The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087

Link copied
Case Copied 55 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Dawes v The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 [2022] NSWCATCD 117
Hearing dates: 14 December 2021
Date of orders: 10 January 2022
Decision date: 10 January 2022
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: G. Sarginson, Senior Member
Decision:

(1) Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd is appointed as the strata managing agent of The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 to exercise all the functions of the owners corporation and all the functions of the chairperson, secretary, treasurer and strata committee of the owners corporation under s 237 (1) (a) and (2) (a) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) for a period of 18 months from the date of the making of this order.

Catchwords:

LAND LAW---Strata scheme---s 237 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)---Appointment of compulsory strata manager---Whether circumstances justify appointment of compulsory strata manager

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)

Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)

Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)

Strata Schemes Regulation 2016 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Maple v The Owners-Strata Plan No 8950 [2021] NSWCATCD 108

The Owners-Strata Plan No 1813 v Keevers [2021] NSWCATAP 130

The Owners-Strata Plan No 76317 v Ho [2020] NSWCATAP 205

The Owners-Strata Plan No 80412 v Vickery [2021] NSWCATAP 98

The Owners-Strata Plan SP 20211 v Rosenthal; Rosenthal v The Owners-Strata Plan SP 20211 [2018] NSWCATAP 243

Texts Cited:

NCAT Consumer and Commercial Division Guideline ‘Representation’

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: L. Dawes; C. Ford; M. Jones; J. Chung; J. Stengos; M. Murphy; M. Wong; B. Bazarragchaa; B. Ganbold; P. Quintal; P. Smith; T. Tran; M. Lin; A. Sudiano; E. Sepitiana; D. Nyugen; H. Nhung; A. Bach; A. Porter; D. Lau; L. Wong; P. Lai; B. Sutas; K. Teabpinyok; J. Gawley; X. Jiang; T. Sondjaja; B.Hyunkyung Joo; C. Chicharncheep. (Applicants)
The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087; Professional Strata Management Group; Y. Lin; S. Chew; X. Bai; T. Chen; H. Han; K. Hu; B. Guo; Z. Zhao; R. Du (Respondents)
Representation: G. Grasso-Lay Advocate (Applicants)
Counsel:
M. Klooster (First Respondent-The Owners Strata Plan No 93087)
Solicitors:
CJ Boyd Solicitors (First Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 21/46945
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. This is a dispute involving whether there should be compulsory appointment of a strata manager under s 237 (1) (a) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (‘the SSMA’) to a strata scheme located in a suburb in the inner west of Sydney NSW.

  2. Although a number of parties are listed as Applicants and Respondents, the parties that were represented and sought to actively participate in the hearing on 14 December 2021 were Mr Dawes (the First Applicant); and the owners corporation (the First Respondent).

  3. In this regard, although the application identified a number of Applicants, a number of such Applicants appear to have been listed by reason of Mr Dawes writing to Lot owners and soliciting them to join the proceedings as co-Applicants prior to the filing of proceedings.

  4. A copy of such correspondence was included in the documentary…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Dawes v The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWCATCD 117
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Dawes v The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 was heard in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The dispute arose from the management of a strata scheme in which the plaintiff, Dawes, was a unit owner. Dawes applied for the appointment of a compulsory strata manager, alleging that the existing management of the scheme was ineffective and that the owners corporation was unable to perform its statutory obligations under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The defendants, the owners corporation, opposed the application.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the circumstances justified the appointment of a compulsory strata manager under section 237 of the Act. In making this determination, the Tribunal considered evidence regarding the owners corporation's ability to manage the scheme, the conduct of the owners corporation, and the impact of the owners corporation's actions on the unit owners. The Tribunal also considered the potential benefits of appointing a compulsory strata manager in terms of restoring effective management of the scheme.

The Tribunal found that the circumstances did justify the appointment of a compulsory strata manager. The evidence showed that the owners corporation was unable to perform its statutory obligations, and that the conduct of the owners corporation was detrimental to the unit owners. The Tribunal concluded that appointing a compulsory strata manager would provide a solution to the problems with the management of the scheme and would benefit the unit owners. Accordingly, the Tribunal made an order appointing Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd as the strata managing agent for a period of 18 months.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd is appointed as the strata managing agent of The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 to exercise all the functions of the owners corporation and all the functions of the chairperson, secretary, treasurer and strata committee of the owners corporation under s 237 (1) (a) and (2) (a) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) for a period of 18 months from the date of the making of this order.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.