MA v The Owners Strata Plan No 65870

Link copied
Case Copied 36 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Ma v The Owners - Strata Plan No 65870 [2023] NSWCATCD 140
Hearing dates: 26 July 2023 and 13 October 2023
Date of orders: 26 October 2023
Decision date: 26 October 2023
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member
Decision:

1.   Network Strata Services Pty Ltd is appointed as the strata managing agent to exercise all the functions of the first respondent on the terms of the managing agency agreement which is part of exhibit R12 for the period of 12 months.

2.   There is no order as to the costs of the proceedings.

3.   If any party wishes to make an application to vary order 2 above, the applicant (the costs applicant) is to file and serve a costs application, including submissions limited to three pages and any evidence in support, by 9 November 2023.

4.   The respondent to the costs application is to file and serve any submissions limited to three pages and any evidence in reply by 23 November 2023.

5.   The costs applicant is to file any submissions limited to two pages in reply by 30 November 2023.

6.   The applicable parties are to indicate in their submissions whether they consent to an order dispensing with an oral hearing of the costs application, and if they do not consent, submissions of no more than one page as to why an oral hearing should be conducted rather than the application being determined on the papers. If a hearing is not dispensed with, the parties will be advised of a date for the hearing of the application.

Catchwords:

LAND LAW — Strata schemes — Appointment of compulsory strata manager — Whether grounds for compulsory appointment are established — Which of two proposed compulsory strata managers should be appointed

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 28, 29, 36, 52, 60, 71, Sch 4, cl 3

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW)

Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW)

Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), ss 106, 182, 188, 231, 237

Cases Cited:

Bischoff & Ors v Rita Sahade & Anr [2015] NSWCATAP 135

Chen v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 7262 [2022] NSWCATCD 58

Cuzeno Pty Limited v The Owners - Strata Plan 65870 [2013] NSWSC 1385

Dawes and Ors v The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 and Ors (10 January 2022, SC 21/46945, unreported)

Hoare and Ors v The Owners-Strata Plan No 73905 [2018] NSWCATCD 45

Lehner v Owners SP 65870 (6 September 2023, SC 23/21338, unreported)

Lehner v The Owners – Strata Plan 65870 (14 December 2023, SC 22/28963, unreported)

Lehner v The Owners – Strata Plan No 65870 [2023] NSWCATAP 102

Macquarie Developments Pty Ltd & Anor v Forrester & Anor [2005] NSWSC 674

Maple v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 8950 [2021] NSWCATCD 108

The Owners - Strata Plan No 1813 v Keevers [2021] NSWCATAP 130

The Owners – Strata Plan No 76317 v…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read MA v The Owners Strata Plan No 65870 and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] NSWCATCD 140
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved a dispute regarding the appointment of a compulsory strata manager for Strata Plan No 65870. The applicant, MA, sought the appointment of a compulsory strata manager to address what was alleged to be mismanagement and breaches of duty by the existing strata manager, the first respondent. The second respondent, Network Strata Services Pty Ltd, also sought to be appointed as the compulsory strata manager. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The central legal issues for the court to determine were whether the grounds for the compulsory appointment of a strata manager were established and, if so, which of the two proposed managers should be appointed. The applicant argued that the existing strata manager had failed to properly account for monies held in trust, had mismanaged the strata scheme, and had breached their duties under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The applicant also argued that the second respondent was more suited to the role due to their experience and qualifications.

The court considered the evidence presented and the requirements of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The court found that the grounds for the compulsory appointment of a strata manager were indeed established due to the mismanagement and breaches of duty by the existing strata manager. The court also found that the second respondent, Network Strata Services Pty Ltd, was better suited to the role due to their relevant experience and qualifications. The court emphasised the importance of appointing a strata manager who could effectively address the issues within the strata scheme and restore proper management. The court ordered that Network Strata Services Pty Ltd be appointed as the strata managing agent for a period of 12 months, subject to the terms of the managing agency agreement. The court made no order regarding the costs of the proceedings but provided a process for any party to apply to vary the costs order. The court also set out a timeframe for any such application and response, with an option for an oral hearing if the parties did not consent to the application being determined on the papers.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Network Strata Services Pty Ltd is appointed as the strata managing agent to exercise all the functions of the first respondent on the terms of the managing agency agreement which is part of exhibit R12 for the period of 12 months.

2. There is no order as to the costs of the proceedings.

3. If any party wishes to make an application to vary order 2 above, the applicant (the costs applicant) is to file and serve a costs application, including submissions limited to three pages and any evidence in support, by 9 November 2023.

4. The respondent to the costs application is to file and serve any submissions limited to three pages and any evidence in reply by 23 November 2023.

5. The costs applicant is to file any submissions limited to two pages in reply by 30 November 2023.

6. The applicable parties are to indicate in their submissions whether they consent to an order dispensing with an oral hearing of the costs application, and if they do not consent, submissions of no more than one page as to why an oral hearing should be conducted rather than the application being determined on the papers. If a hearing is not dispensed with, the parties will be advised of a date for the hearing of the application.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.