Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Malenha v Sullivan [2017] NSWCATAD 222 Hearing dates: 15 November 2017 Date of orders: 11 December 2017 Decision date: 11 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R C Titterton, Principal Member
A Lowe, General MemberDecision: On or before 08 January 2018 the respondent is to:
(1) Apologise to the applicant by sending her the statement set out in par [50] of these reasons and signed by her.
(2) Provide a copy of her signed apology to NSW Housing, and ask it to cause the apology to be placed in the community hall on the ground floor of the building where the applicant used to live.
(3) Pay the applicant $2,500.
(4) If the respondent does not comply with order (1) the respondent is to pay the applicant $2,500 by way of damages for non-compliance.Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — Discrimination — Grounds — Racial vilification – Where applicant called a “Portuguese pig” -
HUMAN RIGHTS — Discrimination — Grounds — Racial vilification – Remedies – Principles in relation to compensation for economic loss - Principles in relation to compensation for non-economic loss -Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: Burns v Sunol [2012] NSWADT 246
Margan v Taufaao [2017] NSWCATAD 216
Sunol v Collier (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 44
Veloskey v Karagiannakis [2002] NSWADATAP 18Texts Cited: Rees, Rice and Allen, Australian Anti-Discrimination Law, Second Edition, (Federation Press, 2014). Category: Principal judgment Parties: Clotilde (Judite Ferreira) Rodrigues Malenha (Applicant)
Clare Sullivan (Respondent)Representation: P Griffin SC (Applicant)
File Number(s): 2017/00279605
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
The applicant Mrs Clotilde Malenha and the respondent Ms Clare Sullivan were neighbours in a social housing complex in Daisyville. Mrs Malenha alleges that Ms Sullivan repeatedly and consistently subjected her to racial abuse, which included public comments which Mrs Malenha alleges had the capacity to incite hatred on the basis of her race.
-
Mrs Malenha asks that the Tribunal order the respondent Ms Clare Sullivan to pay her compensation for economic and for non-economic loss, and that we order Ms Sullivan to apologise to her and a further order that the respondent cease her behaviour.
-
For the reasons that follow, we have decided to order the respondent:
To apologise to Mrs Malenha;
To provide a copy of her signed apology to NSW Housing, and ask it to cause the apology to be placed in the community hall on the ground floor of the building where Mrs Malenha used to live;
To pay Mrs Malenha $2,500 as compensation.
-
If the respondent does not apologise to Mrs Malenha in accordance with these reasons, she is to pay Mrs Malenha $2,500 as damages for non-compliance.
Preliminary
-
The respondent did not appear at the hearing. We were satisfied that she had been notified of the hearing. She had not appeared at any of the direction hearings, nor filed any documents in accordance with earlier directions. In the circumstances, we thought it appropriate for the hearing…
Continue reading Malenha v Sullivan
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Malenha v Sullivan [2017] NSWCATAD 222
- Case
- [2017] NSWCATAD 222
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the term “Portuguese pig” was a racial epithet and that the respondent's conduct was indeed a case of racial vilification. In determining the compensation, the court considered the principles of awarding damages for economic loss, which involves quantifiable financial loss, and non-economic loss, which encompasses more subjective aspects such as pain, suffering, and loss of amenity. The court concluded that the appropriate remedy included an apology, public display of the apology, and a monetary compensation of $2,500. Furthermore, if the respondent failed to comply with the ordered apology, additional damages of $2,500 were to be paid.
The court issued several orders, including that the respondent must apologise to the applicant by a specific date and place the apology in a public location. Additionally, the respondent was ordered to pay the applicant $2,500. If the respondent did not comply with the apology order, they were to pay an additional $2,500 in damages. This ruling reinforces the importance of addressing racial vilification and the court's role in providing both punitive and compensatory remedies.
Orders
Orders of the court
On or before 08 January 2018 the respondent is to:
(1) Apologise to the applicant by sending her the statement set out in par [50] of these reasons and signed by her.
(2) Provide a copy of her signed apology to NSW Housing, and ask it to cause the apology to be placed in the community hall on the ground floor of the building where the applicant used to live.
(3) Pay the applicant $2,500.
(4) If the respondent does not comply with order (1) the respondent is to pay the applicant $2,500 by way of damages for non-compliance.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.