Reported Decision:
56 ACSR 35
64 NSWLR 244
Court of Appeal
CITATION: WINNOTE PTY LIMITED v PAGE & ORS [2005] NSWCA 362
HEARING DATE(S): 30 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE:
28 October 2005JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1
DECISION: Application dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - security for costs - where a corporate appellant is in liquidation - s1335(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - applicability to appeals - whether plaintiff includes appellant - Pt 51 r16 Supreme Court Rules - whether power to order security is engaged - special circumstances - mere impecuniosity - presence of a litigation funder - where co-appellant is solvent - highly likely that costs will be ordered against both appellants - refusal of discretion - delay. (D)
LEGISLATION CITED: Mines Act 1958 (Vic)
Companies Act 1862 (UK)
Supreme Court Rules Pt 51 r16
Constitution s109
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s1335(1)CASES CITED: Buckley v Bennell Design & Constructions Pty Ltd (1974) 1 ACLR 301
Fiduciary Limited v Morning Star Research Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 664, 208 ALR 564
Fostif Pty Ltd v Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 83
FPM Constructions Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 147
Gemelle v Commissioner of Taxation (1982) 7 ACLR 3
Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215
Harper v Ariadne Aust Ltd [1984] 2 Qd R 523
Harrington Services Pty Ltd (In liq) v Harrington [2003] NSWCA 89
In Re Consolidated Southrand Mines Deep Limited (1909) WN 66
In Re Diamond Fuel Company (1879) 13 Ch D 400
In Re Photographic Artists Co-Operative Supply Association (1883) 23 Ch D 370
Interwest Ltd v Tri-Continental Corporation Ltd (1991) 5 ACSC 621
J & M O'Brien Enterprises Pty Ltd v The Shell Company of Australia Ltd (1983) 7 ACLR 790
John Bishop (Caterers) Ltd v National Union Bank Ltd [1973] 1 All ER 707
Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] AC 1
Maples v Hughes [2002] NSWSC 617
Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd (2001) 54 NSWLR 82
Pearson v Naydler [1977] 1 WLR 899
Project 28 Pty Ltd (Formerly Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd) v Barr [2005] NSWCA 240
Roach v Page & Ors (No 1) [2003] NSWSC 722
Sinclair v Glasgow Corporation (1904) 6 F (Ct of Sess) 818
Strata Consolidated (Australia) Pty Ltd v Bradshaw [2000] NSWCA 114 (Registrar Jupp) affirmed on appeal [2000] NSWCA 225
Thomas v D'Arcy [2005] QCA 68
Transglobal Capital Pty Ltd v Yolarno Pty Ltd (2004) 60 NSWLR 143
Uptown Sydney Development Corporation Pty Ltd v Bank of New Zealand (No 1) (1993) 11 ACSR 300PARTIES: Winnote Pty Limited (In liquidation) & Anor v Brian John PAGE & Ors
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 41095/2004
COUNSEL: Claimants: R Darke SC
Opponent: Dr A S BellSOLICITORS: Claimants: Maurice Blackburn Cashman
Opponent: Allens Arthur Robinson
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 20950/1997
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sperling J
CA 41095/2004
SC 20950/1997Friday 28 October 2005MASON P
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] NSWCA 362
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant, being a company in liquidation, was required to provide security for costs under section 1335(1) of the *Corporations Act 2001* (Cth) in the context of an appeal. This also involved determining whether the Supreme Court Rules, specifically Part 51 rule 16, which grants the court power to order security for costs, was engaged and whether special circumstances existed to warrant such an order, considering factors such as the applicant's impecuniosity, the presence of a litigation funder, and the solvency of a co-appellant.
Mason P considered the application of section 1335(1) of the *Corporations Act 2001* to appeals, noting that the provision applies to "any proceedings" and that an appeal is a proceeding. His Honour found that the mere fact of impecuniosity, even in the context of a company in liquidation, did not automatically necessitate an order for security for costs, particularly where a litigation funder was involved. The Court also considered the potential for costs to be ordered against both appellants and the delay in the application. Ultimately, Mason P exercised his discretion to refuse the application for security for costs.
The application for security for costs was dismissed, and the respondent was awarded its costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.