Liu v Stephen Grubits and Associates

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Liu v Stephen Grubits and Associates [2019] FCAFC 24

Appeal from: Liu v Stephen Grubits and Associates (No 2) [2018] FCCA 842
File number: NSD 783 of 2018
Judges: REEVES, KERR AND LEE JJ
Date of judgment: 12 February 2019
Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court – whether primary judge erred in awarding costs against the appellant in a matter arising under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

COSTS – contention that there is no power for the Federal Circuit Court to award costs against a party in proceedings relating to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act – consideration of the construction and application of s 570 of the Fair Work Act in circumstances where s 79 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) does not apply in proceedings relating to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act – appeal dismissed – Federal Circuit Court does have power to award costs against a party when the preconditions specified in s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act are satisfied  

Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 13, 15AA
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 12, 539, 545, 569, 569A, 570, Pt 4-2 Div 4
Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 79
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 79
Cases cited:

Australasian Meat Industry Employees’ Union v Fair Work Australia (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 103; (2012) 203 FCR 430

Commissioner of Police for New South Wales v Eaton [2013] HCA 2; (2013) 252 CLR 1

Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405

Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Proprietary Limited v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1981) 147 CLR 297

Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner [2015] FCAFC 20; (2015) 229 FCR 221

SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 91 ALJR 936

Date of hearing: 12 February 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr I Chatterjee
Solicitor for the Appellant: AHL Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Lambert
Solicitor for the Respondent: Michael Green Legal

ORDERS

NSD 783 of 2018
BETWEEN:

YUNLONG LIU

Appellant

AND:

STEPHEN GRUBITS & ASSOCIATES

Respondent

JUDGES:

REEVES, KERR AND LEE JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

12 FEBRUARY 2019

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The amended notice of appeal filed 25 September 2018 is dismissed.

2.The appellant is to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 7 days.

3.The respondent is to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 14 days.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from the transcript)

THE COURT:

  1. A costs order was made by the primary judge in a Federal Circuit Court of Australia proceeding in relation to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Liu v Stephen Grubits and Associates and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] FCAFC 24
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Liu appealed against a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia which awarded costs against him in proceedings relating to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Liu contended that there is no power for the Federal Circuit Court to award costs against a party in proceedings relating to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act. The Fair Work Act provides that the Federal Circuit Court has jurisdiction to award costs against a party when the preconditions specified in s 570(2) are satisfied. The Court was required to determine whether the Federal Circuit Court has the power to award costs against a party when the preconditions specified in s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act are satisfied. The Court considered the construction and application of s 570 of the Fair Work Act in circumstances where s 79 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) does not apply in proceedings relating to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act. The Court found that the Federal Circuit Court does have power to award costs against a party when the preconditions specified in s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act are satisfied.

The Court dismissed Liu’s appeal and ordered him to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 7 days and the respondent to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 14 days.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The amended notice of appeal filed 25 September 2018 is dismissed.

2. The appellant is to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 7 days.

3. The respondent is to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 14 days.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.