FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| LAURIE & CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR | [2009] FamCAFC 183 |
| FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – Application in an Appeal – Leave to reinstate an abandoned appeal – Appeal against a decision from the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing an appeal from the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT) – Where there was a failure to file a draft index to the appeal books – Where the appeal was deemed abandoned by r 22.13(2) – Where a Notice of Constitutional Matter was filed – Where the proceedings involved a matter arising under the Constitution or involving the interpretation within the meaning of s 78B of the Judiciary Act1903 (Cth) – Where the Father seeks to agitate issues in relation to the constitutional validity of provisions of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) – Where the grounds of appeal are futile – Where the Father does not agitate any prejudice to him if the application was refused – Where the public cost of the proceedings to date has been significant and the public interest cannot be ignored – Appeal dismissed FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Where the Father has been wholly unsuccessful – Where justifying circumstances as required by s 117 of the Family Law Act have been established – Where there was no evidence that the Father could not afford to pay costs – Costs granted |
| Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) |
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Laurie & Child Support Registrar and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2009] FamCAFC 183
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court was required to address included whether the appeal could be reinstated, and if the grounds of appeal were valid. The court also considered whether the Applicant had any justifiable circumstances to warrant the grant of costs under section 117 of the Family Law Act, given the Applicant's unsuccessful appeal and the significant public costs incurred to date.
The court held that the appeal should be dismissed as the Applicant failed to comply with procedural requirements by not filing a draft index, leading to the abandonment of the appeal. Additionally, the grounds of appeal were deemed futile and without merit. The Applicant did not demonstrate any prejudice that would warrant the reinstatement of the appeal, nor did he address the public cost implications of the proceedings. Consequently, the application to reinstate the appeal was dismissed. Given the Applicant's unsuccessful appeal and the lack of any evidence that he could not afford to pay costs, the court granted costs against the Applicant in the amount of $3,363.55, to be paid within 36 days.
The court's final orders were that the application in an appeal filed on behalf of Mr Laurie be dismissed, that Mr Laurie pay the costs of the Deputy Child Support Registrar, and that the amount of those costs be assessed as $3,363.55, to be paid within 36 days of the date of the orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Application in an Appeal filed on behalf of Mr Laurie (“the Applicant”) be dismissed.
2.
The Applicant pay the costs of the Deputy Child Support Registrar.
3.
The costs referred to in Order 2 hereof be assessed in the amount of $3,363.55.
4.
The Applicant pay to the Deputy Child Support Registrar the amount in Order 3 hereof within 36 days of the date of these orders.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.