FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & CARPENTER | [2012] FMCAfam 829 |
| CHILD SUPPORT – Enforcement – child support debt – late payment penalties – where arrears of child support paid prior to the final hearing – delay – where unwarrantable delay in seeking enforcement. COSTS – Where Applicant seeks costs – whether costs order appropriate – costs do not follow the event in enforcement proceedings. |
| Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), ss.30, 67, 68, 105, 116 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss.117, 117AB Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 Sch.1 |
| Breen & Breen (unreported) 13 June 1996 Child Support Registrar & Stewart [2010] FMCAfam 38 Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (No.1) [2009] FCA 562 Frei & Frei-Suter (unreported) 12 March 1996 Hendy v Deputy Child Support Registrar (2001) 27 Fam LR 641; [2001] FamCA 632 The King v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex Parte Ozone Theatres (Aust.) Ltd (1949) 78 CLR 389 Laurie v Child Support Registrar [2009] FamCAFC 183 Mathieson & Hamilton [2006] FMCAfam 238 |
| Applicant: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| Respondent: | MR CARPENTER |
| File Number: | SYC 5036 of 2011 |
| Judgment of: | Scarlett FM |
| Hearing dates: | 15 May & 12 June 2012 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 12 June 2012 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 14 August 2012 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitor for the Applicant: | Ms Jones |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Australian Government Solicitor |
| Solicitor for the Respondent: | Ms Pilkinton |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Legal Aid NSW |
ORDERS
All previous Orders are discharged.
The Court declines to order that the Respondent pay any amount to the Applicant by way of late payment penalties.
The Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs fixed in the sum of $1,500.00 by instalments of $60.00 per month, the first payment to be made ONE (1) month from the date of these Orders and monthly thereafter.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Child Support Registrar & Carpenter is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 5036 of 2011
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Applicant
And
| MR CARPENTER |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Application
This is an Application by the Child Support Registrar for a declaration that the Respondent owes an amount of late payment penalties arising from arrears of child support that have since been paid. The Child Support Registrar also seeks an order for costs.
Background
On 19th August 2011 the Child Support Registrar filed an Application in a Case seeking a direction that the Respondent owed an amount in respect of arrears of child support and late payment penalties as evidenced by a certificate issued under s.116(2) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988. The Application was supported by an affidavit showing that the child support was payable in respect of the Respondent’s daughter who was born [in] 1989.
On 13th March 2012 the Child Support Registrar filed in court proposed Minutes of Orders Sought seeking a declaration that as at that…
Continue reading CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & CARPENTER
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & CARPENTER [2012] FMCAfam 829
- Case
- [2012] FMCAfam 829
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine two primary issues: first, whether the Registrar was entitled to late payment penalties despite the payment of arrears before the final hearing; and second, whether an order for costs was appropriate in these enforcement proceedings. The court assessed whether there had been an unwarrantable delay in the Registrar’s enforcement actions, which could impact the imposition of penalties and the award of costs.
The court held that the Registrar’s delay in enforcing the payment of child support was unwarrantable, and therefore, the Registrar was not entitled to late payment penalties. The court further noted that costs typically do not follow the event in enforcement proceedings, but in this instance, it deemed an order for costs appropriate due to the Registrar's failure to act promptly. The court concluded that the Registrar should be compensated for the time and resources expended due to the delay. The court fixed the total costs at $1,500, to be paid in monthly instalments of $60 starting one month from the date of the orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
All previous Orders are discharged.
2.
The Court declines to order that the Respondent pay any amount to the Applicant by way of late payment penalties.
3.
The Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs fixed in the sum of $1,500.00 by instalments of $60.00 per month, the first payment to be made ONE (1) month from the date of these Orders and monthly thereafter.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.