Legal Research
Cases
Kusumanadi v Artemas (No. 2)

Kusumanadi v Artemas (No. 2)

Case [2016] VCC 1834

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Kusumanadi v Artemas (No. 2) [2016] VCC 1834
Case: [2016] VCC 1834
Decision Date: 6 December 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Kusumanadi v Artemas (No. 2) [2016] VCC 1834

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd [2010] HCA 19
Citation 1

…disturbed without it being joined and heard. The principles are discussed fully in John Alexander’s Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1 (a case concerning a mortgage that was known but unregistered) per French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon and Kiefel JJ at 44 – 48 [126] – [138] ”. 7On 30 Novemb…
AJ Lucas Drilling Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 310
Citation 2

…” – Section 58 Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) – AJ Lucas Drilling Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 310, and Anchen v Da Costa [2005] VSC 191 followed.…
Victorian Workcover Authority v Esso Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 53
Citation 3

…18Justice Kirby said in Victorian WorkCover Authority v Esso Australia Limited [2001] HCA 53; (2001) 207 CLR 520 at 546, that section 58, as well as sections 59 and 60 of the Act, have “ the beneficial purpose of providing…for the award of interest to compensate parties who have been obliged to take ‘proceedings…
Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [1998] HCA 31
Citation 4

…ackson v Sterling Industries (1987) 162 CLR 612, 621, 625 and Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) (1998) 195 CLR 1, [73]. 34The plaintiffs have obtained judgment, including interest, for a substantial sum. In the past, Mr Artemas has by his words and actions demonstrated…
Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd [1987] HCA 23
Citation 5

…er is not designed to provide security for the applicant’s claim ”. The defendants relied upon the decisions of Jackson v Sterling Industries (1987) 162 CLR 612, 621, 625 and Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) (1998) 195 CLR 1, [73]. 34The plaintiffs have obtained judgment…
Zhen v Mo [2008] VSC 300
Citation 6

…that] the balance of convenience [favoured] the granting of the freezing order ”, relying upon the judgment of J. Forrest J in Zhen v Mo [2008] VSC 300 (“ Zhen ”) at paragraphs [21] to [30]. 32The plaintiff relied upon the following findings that I had made in my reasons for judgment: a. the transfer by Mr Artem…
Anchen v Mendes da Costa [2005] VSC 191
Citation 7

…(Vic) – AJ Lucas Drilling Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 310, and Anchen v Da Costa [2005] VSC 191 followed.…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ortell [2016] VCC 1459
Citation 8

…etter before action ”. 25As I noted in Dumayne Property Group Pty Ltd v Balanced Securities Ltd (No. 2) [2016] VCC 1459 at paragraph 5, the Court of Appeal in Lucas Drilling considered that in construing the phrase “ demand of payment ”: “ a. a demand of payment ‘need not be in any particular form’; b. a demand ne…

AI Chat coming soon