| CITATION: | Kennett v Natwide Pty Ltd [2016] QCATA 15 |
| PARTIES: | Andrew Kennett | |
| v | ||
| Natwide Pty Ltd | ||
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | APL335-15 | |
| MATTER TYPE: | Appeals |
| HEARING DATE: | 12 January 2016 |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | Justice Carmody |
| DELIVERED ON: | 22 January 2016 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
| ORDERS MADE: | THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave to appeal is refused. | ||
| CATCHWORDS: | APPEAL – LEAVE TO APPEAL – where the applicant sought leave to appeal against a decision of a Magistrate ordering the applicants to pay the respondent monies relating to an irregular termination of a tenancy– whether leave to appeal should be granted. Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), ss 8, 26, 27, 142, 147, sch 3 Bruce Moon v Office of State Revenue (unreported, Queensland Civil and Administrative Appeal Tribunal, APL213-15, 4 December 2015, Carmody J) | ||
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
APPLICANT/APPELLANT A Kennett (self-represented)
RESPONDENT A Ward for the first respondent
REASONS FOR DECISION
This is an application for leave to appeal, filed by the applicant on 25 August 2015, against the decision of Magistrate Carroll, exercising the minor civil dispute jurisdiction of QCAT, on 24 June 2015.
The respondent was a tenant under a lease agreement in a property managed by the respondent real estate agent owned by a third party residing in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China.
The respondent issued a Notice to Leave under the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) against the applicant. The applicant has not claimed that the Notice to Leave was defective, or that the issuing of the Notice to Leave was unlawful.
The applicant failed to leave in accordance with the Notice to Leave and the respondent successfully obtained a warrant of possession to eject the applicant from the premises. The warrant of possession was executed on the premises on 2 June 2015, although the evidence indicates that…
Continue reading Kennett v Natwide Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kennett v Natwide Pty Ltd [2016] QCATA 15
- Case
- [2016] QCATA 15
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court deliberated on the criteria for granting leave to appeal, which include whether the appeal raises a question of law of general public importance, or whether there were any other special circumstances justifying the grant of leave. The court examined the nature of the tenancy termination and the regularity of the proceedings leading to the Magistrate's decision. It also considered the potential impact of the appeal on broader legal principles, as well as the specific circumstances of this case. Ultimately, the court found that the appeal did not meet the threshold for leave, as it did not present a question of law of general public importance nor did it have any other special circumstances warranting appeal.
Consequently, the appeal tribunal ordered that leave to appeal be refused. This decision reinforces the stringent criteria that must be met for leave to appeal to be granted in similar cases. The tribunal's ruling underscores the importance of the principles governing tenancy law and the procedural regularity of court proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal is refused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.