Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning

Link copied
Case Copied 45 min read

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 240
PARTIES:

APPLICANT:
Roy "Dootch" Kennedy on behalf of the Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy

FIRST RESPONDENT:
NSW Minister for Planning

SECOND RESPONDENT:
Stockland Developments Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 40742 of 2010
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: JUDICIAL REVIEW :- validity of approvals of modifications of project approvals under Part 3A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - Minister under duty to consider the public interest - whether Minister breached duty by allegedly failing to consider protection of Aboriginal heritage as recommended in three reports, Aboriginal artefacts and principles of ecologically sustainable development - whether approval of modifications manifestly unreasonable - whether Minister denied applicant procedural fairness
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 75I, 75J, 75W, 96
Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Infrastructure and Other Planning Reform) Act 2005
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 8G
Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, r 4.7
National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, ss 69B - 69F, 84, 86, 90
Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991, s 6(2)
State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Development) 2005
CASES CITED: Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWLEC 50
Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd & Ors [2002] NSWLEC 216
Carriage v Stockland Development Pty Ltd & Ors [No 6] [2004] NSWLEC 541
Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576
Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 129
Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 177
Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550
Minister for Planning v Walker [2008] NSWCA 224, 161 LGERA 423
Parks and Playgrounds Movement Inc v Newcastle City Council [2010] NSWLEC 231
Roy Kennedy v Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation [2006] NSWLEC 456
SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63, 228 CLR 152
Tubbo Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 [2008] NSWCA 356
Walker v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 741, 157 LGERA 124
Walsh v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 255, 161 LGERA 118
DATES OF HEARING: 13-15 October 2010
 
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 

19 November 2010
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT:
Mr Alan Oshlack, agent


FIRST RESPONDENT:
Dr J Renwick
SOLICITORS
NSW Department of Planning

SECOND RESPONDENT:
Mr J Robson SC with Mr H El-Hage
SOLICITORS
Herbert Geer

JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      BISCOE J

      19 November 2010

      40742 of 2010

      KENNEDY v NSW MINISTER FOR PLANNING & ANOR

      CONTENTS

      Paragraphs

        INTRODUCTION………………………………………………….1-7

        THE MODIFICATIONS………………………………………….8-15

        THE STATUTORY REGIME…………………………………..16-19

        BACKGROUND…………………………………………………20-53

        GROUND 1: FAILURE TO CONSIDER PROTECTION
    OF ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE AS
    RECOMMENDED IN 3 REPORTS……………………………54-68


        GROUND 2: FAILURE TO CONSIDER ABORIGINAL
        ARTEFACTS…………………………………………………….69-75

        GROUND 3: FAILURE TO CONSIDER PRINCIPLES OF
        ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT………..76-90

        GROUND 4: MANIFEST UNREASONABLENESS………….91-94

        GROUND 5: DENIAL OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS…….95-113

        ORDERS………………………………………………………114-115

INTRODUCTION

1 HIS HONOUR: Sandon Point is a 53 hectare coastal plain 14 kilometres north of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] NSWLEC 240
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales was called upon to decide the validity of two modification approvals of a major project approval under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The modifications related to the development of a 23.35 hectare site at Sandon Point by Stockland Developments Pty Ltd. The applicant, Roy "Dootch" Kennedy, on behalf of the Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy, challenged the validity of the modification approvals on several grounds, including the failure to consider the protection of Aboriginal cultural heritage, failure to consider Aboriginal artefacts, failure to consider principles of ecologically sustainable development, manifest unreasonableness, and denial of procedural fairness. The court examined each ground of challenge and concluded that none of the grounds were valid. The court held that the Minister for Planning had considered the relevant matters, including Aboriginal cultural heritage and principles of ecologically sustainable development, in approving the modifications. The court also found that the modifications were not manifestly unreasonable and that procedural fairness was observed in the decision-making process. The court dismissed the application and reserved costs, allowing for a potential application for costs by the applicant within seven days of the judgment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.