Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 240 PARTIES: APPLICANT:
Roy "Dootch" Kennedy on behalf of the Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent EmbassyFIRST RESPONDENT:
SECOND RESPONDENT:
NSW Minister for Planning
Stockland Developments Pty LtdFILE NUMBER(S): 40742 of 2010 CORAM: Biscoe J KEY ISSUES: JUDICIAL REVIEW :- validity of approvals of modifications of project approvals under Part 3A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - Minister under duty to consider the public interest - whether Minister breached duty by allegedly failing to consider protection of Aboriginal heritage as recommended in three reports, Aboriginal artefacts and principles of ecologically sustainable development - whether approval of modifications manifestly unreasonable - whether Minister denied applicant procedural fairness LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 75I, 75J, 75W, 96
Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Infrastructure and Other Planning Reform) Act 2005
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 8G
Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, r 4.7
National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, ss 69B - 69F, 84, 86, 90
Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991, s 6(2)
State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Development) 2005CASES CITED: Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWLEC 50
Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd & Ors [2002] NSWLEC 216
Carriage v Stockland Development Pty Ltd & Ors [No 6] [2004] NSWLEC 541
Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576
Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 129
Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 177
Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550
Minister for Planning v Walker [2008] NSWCA 224, 161 LGERA 423
Parks and Playgrounds Movement Inc v Newcastle City Council [2010] NSWLEC 231
Roy Kennedy v Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation [2006] NSWLEC 456
SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63, 228 CLR 152
Tubbo Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 [2008] NSWCA 356
Walker v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 741, 157 LGERA 124
Walsh v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 255, 161 LGERA 118DATES OF HEARING: 13-15 October 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
19 November 2010LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT:
Mr Alan Oshlack, agentSECOND RESPONDENT:
FIRST RESPONDENT:
Dr J Renwick
SOLICITORS
NSW Department of Planning
Mr J Robson SC with Mr H El-Hage
SOLICITORS
Herbert Geer
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BISCOE J
19 November 2010
KENNEDY v NSW MINISTER FOR PLANNING & ANOR40742 of 2010
CONTENTS
Paragraphs
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………….1-7
THE MODIFICATIONS………………………………………….8-15
THE STATUTORY REGIME…………………………………..16-19
GROUND 1: FAILURE TO CONSIDER PROTECTIONBACKGROUND…………………………………………………20-53
RECOMMENDED IN 3 REPORTS……………………………54-68
GROUND 2: FAILURE TO CONSIDER ABORIGINAL
ARTEFACTS…………………………………………………….69-75
GROUND 3: FAILURE TO CONSIDER PRINCIPLES OF
ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT………..76-90
GROUND 4: MANIFEST UNREASONABLENESS………….91-94
ORDERS………………………………………………………114-115GROUND 5: DENIAL OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS…….95-113
INTRODUCTION
1 HIS HONOUR: Sandon Point is a 53 hectare coastal plain 14 kilometres north of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] NSWLEC 240
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.