-
Hatzigiakov v Cooney
[2022] VSC 308
Para 1
…that the two judgments of J Forrest J were given after (although without reference to) Richter v Driscoll . [32][2022] VSC 308, [104]. [33][2018] VSCA 124, [39]–[40]. Cf Gruma Oceania Pty Ltd v Bakar [2014] VSCA 252, [30].…
-
Miletic v ANZ Banking Group Limited
[2022] VSC 240
Para 1
…otzman [2016] VSC 482, [29] (John Dixon J); Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 394, [35]; Miletic v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2022] VSC 240, [23].…
-
Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2022] HCA 17
Para 1
…rke [2019] VSCA 302, [51]; Devaney v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2021] VSCA 168, [64]; Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17, [22]–[27]. See further below. [5]See Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174, [32]–[64] and see further below.…
-
A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim
[2022] VSCA 46
Para 1
…decision.[5] [4]See especially Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [29]–[64], [79]–[92], [93]–[106]; A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46, [29]–[44]; cf Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315, [46]–[53], [57]–[73]. See also, more generally, Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51]; Devaney v Crown Melbourne Ltd [20…
-
Akbari v Victorian WorkCover Authority
[2022] VSC 84
Para 1
…grounds 7(a) and (b) there quoted); Popal v Panda Care Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 812, [47]–[48]; Akbari v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2022] VSC 84, [46]–[48], [62]; A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46, [13], [32]. [81][2021] VSC 320, [13]–[39], [51]. [82]Footnotes included, but renumbered.…
-
El-Najjar v Swidryk Investments Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 814
Para 1
…, [26]–[30] (Richards J); Valspar Paint (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ma [2020] VSC 304, [50] (Richards J); El-Najjar v Swidryk Investments Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 814, [55]–[56] (Richards J). See also my judgment in Pearce v Lloyd [2016] VSC 806, [60]–[61]. Cf Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [106]. [62] Hossain v Minister…
-
Popal v Panda Care Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 812
Para 1
…]; Moutray v The Union Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 723, [49] (see grounds 7(a) and (b) there quoted); Popal v Panda Care Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 812, [47]–[48]; Akbari v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2022] VSC 84, [46]–[48], [62]; A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46, [13], [32]. [81][2021] VSC 320, [13…
-
Moutray v The Union Pastoral Co Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 723
Para 1
…v Westside Meats Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 320, [10]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [85]–[87]; Moutray v The Union Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 723, [49] (see grounds 7(a) and (b) there quoted); Popal v Panda Care Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 812, [47]–[48]; Akbari v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2022] VSC 84, [46]–[48], […
-
Sidiqi v Kotsios
[2021] VSCA 187
Para 1
…y the plaintiff was not engaged in employment during certain periods prior to the Panel’s decision.[5] [4]See especially Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [29]–[64], [79]–[92], [93]–[106]; A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46, [29]–[44]; cf Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315, [46]–[53], [57]–[73]. See also, m…
-
Devaney v Crown Melbourne Ltd
[2021] VSCA 168
Para 1
…A 315, [46]–[53], [57]–[73]. See also, more generally, Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51]; Devaney v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2021] VSCA 168, [64]; Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17, [22]–[27]. See further below. [5]See Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174, [32]–[64] and see further below.…
-
Bainbridge v Westside Meats Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 320
Para 1
…[2021] VSC 30, [62]–[70], [86]–[94]; Yildirim v A & L Windows Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 139, [25]–[27]; Bainbridge v Westside Meats Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 320, [10]; Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [85]–[87]; Moutray v The Union Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 723, [49] (see grounds 7(a) and (b) there quoted); Popal v Pan…
-
MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2021] HCA 17
Para 1
…Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123, [29]–[31]; MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 390 ALR 590, [2], [27]–[60]; Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174, [93]–[100], [145]. [63]See Re McBain; ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372, [80], [82]…
-
Yildirim v A&L Windows Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 139
Para 1
…procedural fairness or otherwise, to re-list the present case for further argument. [21] Yildirim v A & L Windows Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 139. [22] A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46. [23][2021] VSCA 187. [24]That is, after I reserved judgment in this matter.…
-
Seadon v Seniors Community Care Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 30
Para 1
…‘ Bainbridge ’).[81] The most relevant section of his Honour’s judgment reads as follows:[82] [80] Sneadon v Seniors Community Care Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 30, [62]–[70], [86]–[94]; Yildirim v A & L Windows Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 139, [25]–[27]; Bainbridge v Westside Meats Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 320, [10]; Sidiqi v Kotsios […
-
Valspar Paint (Australia) Pty Ltd v MA
[2020] VSC 304
Para 1
…[19] (John Dixon J); Morrison v Melbourne Pathology Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 477, [26]–[30] (Richards J); Valspar Paint (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ma [2020] VSC 304, [50] (Richards J); El-Najjar v Swidryk Investments Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 814, [55]–[56] (Richards J). See also my judgment in Pearce v Lloyd [2016] VSC 806, [60]…
-
FKM17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
[2020] FCA 192
…Court of Appeal in 2014 in Gruma Oceania Pty Ltd v Bakar (‘ Gruma ’),[41] in which the Court (Neave, Santamaria and Kyrou JJA) had said:[42] [39][2020] FCA 192, [40]. [40]T 139–140. [41][2014] VSCA 252. [42]At [29]. My emphasis. As a medical panel is an administrative tribunal whose members are not lawyers, its…
-
Dundar v Bas
[2019] VSCA 315
Para 1
…os [2021] VSCA 187, [29]–[64], [79]–[92], [93]–[106]; A & L Windows Pty Ltd v Yildirim [2022] VSCA 46, [29]–[44]; cf Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315, [46]–[53], [57]–[73]. See also, more generally, Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51]; Devaney v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2021] VSCA 168, [64]; Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minist…
-
Maimonis v Bourke
[2019] VSCA 302
Para 1
…[2022] VSCA 46, [29]–[44]; cf Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315, [46]–[53], [57]–[73]. See also, more generally, Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51]; Devaney v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2021] VSCA 168, [64]; Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17, [22]–[27]. See further below. [5]See Chang v Neill (…
-
Mailton Holdings Pty Ltd v Jussy
[2019] VSCA 281
…[52] Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, 498–9 [47]; Mailton Holdings Pty Ltd v Jussy [2019] VSCA 281, [59].…
-
Conroy v Romas
[2019] VSC 695
Para 1
…v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2007] NSWCA 239, [113]. See also my judgment in Love v State of Victoria [2009] VSC 215, [191]; Conroy v Romas [2019] VSC 695, [101]–[102] (Ginnane J).…
-
Chang v Neill
[2019] VSCA 151
Para 1
…168, [64]; Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17, [22]–[27]. See further below. [5]See Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174, [32]–[64] and see further below.…
-
Lang v Spendless Shoes Pty Ltd
[2019] VSC 376
Para 1
…in which I considered Richter v Driscoll and applied aspects of it. He cites a large number of other cases too. [2](2016) 51 VR 95. [3][2019] VSC 376.…
-
Morrison v Melbourne Pathology Pty Ltd
[2018] VSC 477
Para 1
…ruma Oceania Pty Ltd v Bakar [2014] VSCA 252, [47]; Tan v Kotzman [2016] VSC 482, [19] (John Dixon J); Morrison v Melbourne Pathology Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 477, [26]–[30] (Richards J); Valspar Paint (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ma [2020] VSC 304, [50] (Richards J); El-Najjar v Swidryk Investments Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 814, [5…
-
Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2018] HCA 34
Para 1
…yd [2016] VSC 806, [60]–[61]. Cf Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [106]. [62] Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123, [29]–[31]; MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 390 ALR 590, [2], [27]–[60]; Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174, [93]–[100], [145]. [63]See R…
-
Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd
[2018] VSC 394
Para 1
…VR 10, 20 [50] (Osborn JA, Beach JA agreeing); Tan v Kotzman [2016] VSC 482, [29] (John Dixon J); Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 394, [35]; Miletic v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2022] VSC 240, [23].…
-
Karabinis v Bendrups
[2018] VSCA 124
Para 1
…Forrest J were given after (although without reference to) Richter v Driscoll . [32][2022] VSC 308, [104]. [33][2018] VSCA 124, [39]–[40]. Cf Gruma Oceania Pty Ltd v Bakar [2014] VSCA 252, [30].…
-
Pearce v Lloyd
[2016] VSC 806
Para 1
…[50] (Richards J); El-Najjar v Swidryk Investments Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 814, [55]–[56] (Richards J). See also my judgment in Pearce v Lloyd [2016] VSC 806, [60]–[61]. Cf Sidiqi v Kotsios [2021] VSCA 187, [106]. [62] Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123, [29]–[31]; MZAPC v Mini…
-
Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Bendrups
[2016] VSC 718
Para 1
…VSC 177, [56]. [31] Mackinlay v Corlett [2016] VSC 376, [9]; Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Bendrups [2016] VSC 718, [24]. Both cases were decided after and with reference to the judgment of the High Court in Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, a leading case which dealt wit…
-
Tan v Kotzman
[2016] VSC 482
Para 1
…Works (1971) 38 LGRA 6, 18 (Smith J, Adam J agreeing); Ta v Thompson (2013) 46 VR 10, 20 [50] (Osborn JA, Beach JA agreeing); Tan v Kotzman [2016] VSC 482, [29] (John Dixon J); Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 394, [35]; Miletic v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2022] VSC 240, [23].…
-
Harris v DJD Earthmoving Pty Ltd
[2016] VSCA 188
Para 1
…y Ltd (‘ Lang ’),[3] in which I considered Richter v Driscoll and applied aspects of it. He cites a large number of other cases too. [2](2016) 51 VR 95. [3][2019] VSC 376.…
-
Mackinlay v Corlett
[2016] VSC 376
Para 1
…at Wodonga Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 17, [110]. [30] George v Nisselle [2005] VSC 177, [56]. [31] Mackinlay v Corlett [2016] VSC 376, [9]; Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Bendrups [2016] VSC 718, [24]. Both cases were decided after and with reference to the judgment of the High Court in Wingfoot Australia Part…
-
Richter v Driscoll
[2016] VSCA 142
Para 1
…Immigration and Border Protection and Refugee Review Tribunal ,[38] as follows: [34]T 53–54, 111–114, 137–141. [35]For example, see Richter v Driscoll (2016) 51 VR 95, 112 [71(2)]; Ryan v The Grange at Wodonga Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 17, [109]. [36](1996) 185 CLR 259, especially at 271–272. [37]T 111–114, 137–141. [38][2015] FC…
-
AHX15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2015] FCA 1183
Para 1
…e Grange at Wodonga Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 17, [109]. [36](1996) 185 CLR 259, especially at 271–272. [37]T 111–114, 137–141. [38][2015] FCA 1183, [24].…
-
Haq v Dodgshun
[2015] VSC 450
Para 1
…Maribyrnong City Council v Malios [2014] VSC 452, [48]; Vellios Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Barton [2014] VSC 664, [83]; cf Haq v Dodgshun [2015] VSC 450, [45], all cited by Skilled in Skilled’s outline, [36].…
-
Ryan v The Grange at Wodonga Pty Ltd
[2015] VSCA 17
Para 1
…52 CLR 480, 497–498 [43], 499 [48], 501 [54]–[55], 502 [57], 504–505 [63]; Ryan v The Grange at Wodonga Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 17, [110]. [30] George v Nisselle [2005] VSC 177, [56]. [31] Mackinlay v Corlett [2016] VSC 376, [9]; Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Bendrups [2016] VSC 718, [24]. Both cases were…
-
Vellios Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Barton
[2014] VSC 664
Para 1
…s, 3. [183]For similar conclusions, see Maribyrnong City Council v Malios [2014] VSC 452, [48]; Vellios Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Barton [2014] VSC 664, [83]; cf Haq v Dodgshun [2015] VSC 450, [45], all cited by Skilled in Skilled’s outline, [36].…
-
Gruma Oceania Pty Ltd v Bakar
[2014] VSCA 252
Para 1
…hter v Driscoll . [32][2022] VSC 308, [104]. [33][2018] VSCA 124, [39]–[40]. Cf Gruma Oceania Pty Ltd v Bakar [2014] VSCA 252, [30].…
-
North v Homolka
[2014] VSC 478
…[174]Ibid, [40]. Footnote included but renumbered. North v Homolka [2014] VSC 478, [63] (Ashley JA); Vellios Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Barton [2014] VSC 664, [89] (Cavanough J). See also Moore v Barton [2014] VSC 78, [65]–[66] (John Dixon J) and cases there cited.…
-
Maribyrnong City Council v Malios
[2014] VSC 452
Para 1
…f the material.[183] [181]Skilled’s outline, [34]. [182]Panel’s reasons, 3. [183]For similar conclusions, see Maribyrnong City Council v Malios [2014] VSC 452, [48]; Vellios Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Barton [2014] VSC 664, [83]; cf Haq v Dodgshun [2015] VSC 450, [45], all cited by Skilled in Skilled’s outl…
-
Moore v Barton
[2014] VSC 78
…Homolka [2014] VSC 478, [63] (Ashley JA); Vellios Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Barton [2014] VSC 664, [89] (Cavanough J). See also Moore v Barton [2014] VSC 78, [65]–[66] (John Dixon J) and cases there cited.…
-
TA v Thompson
[2013] VSCA 344
Para 1
…ple, Portland Properties Pty Ltd v Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works (1971) 38 LGRA 6, 18 (Smith J, Adam J agreeing); Ta v Thompson (2013) 46 VR 10, 20 [50] (Osborn JA, Beach JA agreeing); Tan v Kotzman [2016] VSC 482, [29] (John Dixon J); Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 394, [35]; Mil…
-
Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak
[2013] HCA 43
Para 1
…As to the binding effect of opinions of Medical Panels, see the Act s 313(4) and see Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480.…
-
Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd
[2012] VSCA 322
…7) 235 ALR 609, 617 [25]; Bojko v ICM Property Service Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 175, [36]; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 322, [9]. Ellipsis and square bracketed amendment in original.…
-
Kocak v Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd
[2011] VSC 285
Para 1
…ch Mr Uren QC opened the case, as indicated in the previous paragraph. [29] Kocak v Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 285, [133], citing Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247, 282–282 (McHugh JA). And see now Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, 497–498…
-
MZYJO v Minister for Immigration
[2011] FMCA 25
…Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, 271–2 (citations omitted); SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609, 617 [25]; Bojko v ICM Property Service Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 175, [36]; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 322, [9]. Ellipsis and square bracketed amendm…
-
Bojko v ICM Property Service Pty Ltd
[2009] NSWCA 175
…s omitted); SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609, 617 [25]; Bojko v ICM Property Service Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 175, [36]; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 322, [9]. Ellipsis and square bracketed amendment in original.…
-
Love v State of Victoria
[2009] VSC 215
Para 1
…idden’ consideration. [192] Ballantyne v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2007] NSWCA 239, [113]. See also my judgment in Love v State of Victoria [2009] VSC 215, [191]; Conroy v Romas [2019] VSC 695, [101]–[102] (Ginnane J).…
-
Ventrice v Riva Plaster Pty Ltd
[2008] VSC 415
…Strata Plan No 4166 v Stirling Properties Ltd [No 2] [1984] VR 903, 913; Dixon v Hacker [2007] VSC 342, [41]–[42]; Ventrice v Riva Plaster Pty Ltd [2008] VSC 415, [12].…
-
Dixon v Hacker
[2007] VSC 342
…[53] Body Corporate Strata Plan No 4166 v Stirling Properties Ltd [No 2] [1984] VR 903, 913; Dixon v Hacker [2007] VSC 342, [41]–[42]; Ventrice v Riva Plaster Pty Ltd [2008] VSC 415, [12].…
-
Ballantyne v Workcover Authority of NSW
[2007] NSWCA 239
Para 1
…ccount.[192] Self-evidently, none of the matters relied on here is a ‘forbidden’ consideration. [192] Ballantyne v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2007] NSWCA 239, [113]. See also my judgment in Love v State of Victoria [2009] VSC 215, [191]; Conroy v Romas [2019] VSC 695, [101]–[102] (Ginnane J).…