JNL Management Pty Ltd v McKinnon

Case [2024] QCATA 121


QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

JNL Management Pty Ltd v McKinnon [2024] QCATA 121

PARTIES:

JNL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD

(applicant/appellant)

v

LORETTA CARMEN MCKINNON

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

APL197-23

ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO/S:


MCD 2995/22

MATTER TYPE:

Appeals

DELIVERED ON:

11 November 2024

HEARING DATE:

On the Papers

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Richard Oliver

ORDERS:

1.     Leave to appeal is granted.

2.     The decision of the Tribunal dated 5 June 2024 is set aside.

3.     The application for minor civil dispute – residential tenancy matter be listed as an urgent tenancy dispute before a different adjudicator.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – RIGHT OF APPEAL – JURISDICTION – LEAVE TO APPEAL – where applicant commenced a minor civil dispute proceeding seeking an order for a warrant of possession as a result of the respondent’s failure to leave under a tenancy agreement – where contested hearing – where proceedings brought in the Supreme Court by the respondent in respect of a contract to purchase the subject property from the applicant – where minor civil dispute proceeding adjourned several times pending the outcome of the Supreme Court proceedings – where minor civil dispute proceeding ultimately dismissed without notice to the applicant – whether applicant entitled to be heard on the proposed dismissal – whether denial of procedural fairness – whether error of law and grounds for leave to appeal

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009, s 142(3)(a)(i)

Rintoul v State of Queensland & Ors [2018] QCA 20.

Terera & Anor v Clifford [2017] QCA 181

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. On 30 June 2023 the appellant filed an application for leave to appeal or appeal from a decision in the minor civil disputes jurisdiction of the Tribunal made on 5 June 2023. That decision related to a residential tenancy dispute between the appellant, the property owner, and the respondent as the tenant. The decision under appeal was to dismiss the applicant’s application for a warrant of possession for, inter alia, failure to leave pursuant to a notice issued under the Residential Tenancy and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (“RTRA Act”).

  2. The reason for the dismissal was because when the primary application in the minor civil dispute jurisdiction was filed on 28 November 2022, there had been concurrent proceedings in the Supreme Court of Queensland in relation to the property brought by the respondent. The respondent had entered into a contract to purchase the property from the applicant but the sale did not proceed because, it seems, the respondent’s financier was not in a position to settle on the completion date. As a consequence the applicant/seller elected to terminate the contract and the deposit was forfeited.

  3. The material filed in the minor civil dispute proceeding, and the appeal, indicate that those proceedings were protracted and continued well into 2024.…

Continue reading JNL Management Pty Ltd v McKinnon

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
JNL Management Pty Ltd v McKinnon [2024] QCATA 121
Case
[2024] QCATA 121
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

JNL Management Pty Ltd sought to appeal against a decision made by a tribunal that dismissed their minor civil dispute proceeding for a warrant of possession. The respondent, McKinnon, had not vacated a property as agreed in a tenancy arrangement, leading to the initial proceeding. However, the respondent initiated separate proceedings in the Supreme Court concerning a contract to purchase the property from JNL Management. Consequently, the minor civil dispute proceeding was repeatedly adjourned. Eventually, the tribunal dismissed the proceeding without notifying JNL Management, prompting their appeal. JNL Management argued they were entitled to be heard before the dismissal and that the tribunal's decision amounted to a denial of procedural fairness. They also contended that there was an error of law that warranted leave to appeal.

The appeal centred on whether JNL Management was denied procedural fairness by not being given an opportunity to be heard before the tribunal dismissed the proceeding. Additionally, the court examined whether there was an error of law that justified granting leave to appeal. The appeal hinged on the interpretation of procedural fairness and the legal principles governing the tribunal's jurisdiction and authority to dismiss a proceeding without notice.

The court granted leave to appeal, finding that JNL Management was indeed denied procedural fairness by not being heard before the dismissal. The tribunal's decision to dismiss the proceeding without notice was deemed an error of law. Consequently, the court set aside the tribunal's decision dated 5 June 2024 and ordered the minor civil dispute proceeding to be listed as an urgent tenancy dispute before a different adjudicator. This ruling underscores the importance of procedural fairness and the need for tribunals to provide parties with an opportunity to be heard before making significant decisions.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave to appeal is granted.

2. The decision of the Tribunal dated 5 June 2024 is set aside.

3. The application for minor civil dispute – residential tenancy matter be listed as an urgent tenancy dispute before a different adjudicator.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.