JMB v Ronkovich

Case [2009] QDC 389


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

JMB v Ronkovich [2009] QDC 389

PARTIES:

JMB

(Applicant)

v

BRENDAN PETER RONKOVICH

(Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

3105/09

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Application for criminal compensation

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

27 November 2009

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

25 November 2009

JUDGE:

Rafter SC DCJ

ORDER:

The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $42,750 by way of compensation pursuant to s.24 Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 for injuries sustained as a result of the offences of grievous bodily harm and sexual assault which led to the conviction of the respondent in the District Court at Brisbane on 7 February 2007

CATCHWORDS:

APPLICATION – CRIMINAL COMPENSATION – grievous bodily harm and sexual assault – physical injuries and mental or nervous shock.

COUNSEL:

D P A Davies for the applicant

No appearance by or for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

McInnes Wilson Lawyers for the applicant

No appearance by or for the respondent

Introduction

  1. The applicant seeks compensation pursuant to s.24 Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 for physical and emotional injuries caused by the respondent on 5 August 2004.

  1. On 7 February 2007 the respondent pleaded guilty to grievous bodily harm and sexual assault.  He was sentenced to three-and-a-half years imprisonment with a parole eligibility date on 6 December 2007.  There was a period of 139 days pre-sentence custody that was taken into account but could not declared as imprisonment served under the sentence. 

  1. On 8 June 2007 the Court of Appeal allowed the respondent’s appeal against sentence.  The court varied the sentence in respect of Count 1, the offence of grievous bodily harm by ordering that the sentence of three-and-a-half years imprisonment be suspended after 10 months for an operational period of four years.  In respect of Count 2, the offence of sexual assault, the court substituted a sentence of 10 months imprisonment and two years probation.[1]

  1. On 6 November 2009 the application and supporting affidavits were served upon the respondent. 

Circumstances of the offences

  1. On the evening of 4 August 2004 the applicant met the respondent at the Alexandra Hills Hotel while playing pool with friends.  She had not previously met the respondent.  The respondent invited her back to his residence to “smoke some pot”.  Soon after arriving at the respondent’s residence the applicant took a puff of the “pot”.  She noticed that the taste was unusual and began to panic.  She requested that the respondent drive her back to the hotel. 

  1. The respondent commenced driving the applicant back to the hotel but turned off in a different direction towards bushland.  The applicant attempted to telephone a friend at the hotel.  The respondent grabbed the telephone from her and threw it down.  He then punched the applicant repeatedly in the face.  At some stage the respondent directed the applicant to remove her pants which she did because she was scared.  The respondent fondled her vagina.  The applicant lost consciousness.

  1. When the applicant regained consciousness she was…

Continue reading JMB v Ronkovich

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
JMB v Ronkovich [2009] QDC 389
Case
[2009] QDC 389
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of JMB v Ronkovich, the applicant, JMB, sought compensation for injuries sustained as a result of grievous bodily harm and sexual assault committed by the respondent, Ronkovich. The matter was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT), where the primary issue was to determine the amount of compensation payable to JMB under the provisions of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995. The dispute arose from the respondent's conviction in the District Court at Brisbane on 7 February 2007, for the offences of grievous bodily harm and sexual assault against the applicant.

The legal issues before QCAT were to assess the physical injuries and the mental or nervous shock experienced by JMB as a consequence of the respondent's criminal acts. The tribunal had to evaluate the extent of the physical harm and the psychological impact on JMB, and then determine an appropriate compensation amount under section 24 of the Act. This involved considering medical evidence, expert opinions, and the nature and severity of the injuries and their long-term effects.

QCAT found that JMB had suffered significant physical injuries and ongoing mental or nervous shock as a direct result of the respondent's criminal acts. The tribunal took into account the severity of the injuries, the duration of the psychological impact, and the overall detriment to JMB's quality of life. Based on this assessment, QCAT ordered that the respondent pay JMB the sum of $42,750 by way of compensation. This amount was deemed sufficient to address the physical injuries and the mental or nervous shock experienced by the applicant.

Orders

Orders of the court

The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $42,750 by way of compensation pursuant to s.24 Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 for injuries sustained as a result of the offences of grievous bodily harm and sexual assault which led to the conviction of the respondent in the District Court at Brisbane on 7 February 2007

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.