Legal Research
Cases
Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd and Anor (No 2)

Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd and Anor (No 2)

Case [2013] VSC 467

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 467
Case: [2013] VSC 467
Decision Date: 4 September 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 467

Most Recent Citation

IMO Calder Park Promotions Pty Ltd (in liquidation) Examinations [2019] VSC 254

Cases Citing This Decision

Marny and Anor and Garnett and Anors [2014] FamCA 247
Citation 1 (Para 16)

…ul was fanciful but I have otherwise dealt with that issue in these reasons; (c)The decision of Sifris J in Jane v Bob Jane Corporation & Anor (No 2) [2013] VSC 467 was distinguishable (and with that submission I agree but the principle to which I shall refer later in these reasons is of some assistance).…
Angeleska v State of Victoria (No 3) [2016] VSC 568
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…party may still make taxation an unattractive option if there are limited prospects of recovery. [58] Jane v Bob Jane Corp Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 467.…
Wieland v Texxcon Pty Ltd; Nominexx v Wieland (No 2) [2016] VSC 109
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…e first trial judgment on 20 June 2013 and the second trial judgment on 2 July 2013. The appeals were obviously conducted thereafter. [40]See Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Limited & Anor (2013) VSC 467.…
Williams v Katis [2014] VSC 471
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…e, costs of a successful party are presumptively to be quantified on the old basis. Put simply, the new rules do not have a retrospective effect. [25][2013] VSC 467 , [5] ― [8] .…
IMO Calder Park Promotions Pty Ltd (in liquidation) Examinations [2014] VSC 254
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…b Jane interests and/or the Laree Jane interests in a number of hearings in the Family Court and in proceedings variously reported at [2013] VSC 406, [2013] VSC 467, [2013] VSC 85, [2014] VSC 27 and [2012] VCC 807.…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Victrawl Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd [1995] HCA 51
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…e of the authorities escapes the general rule against retrospectivity.[6] [6]Fullagar J in Maxwell . 286; Victrawl Pty Ltd v Telstra Corp Ltd (1995), 183 CLR 595, 615.…
Geraldton Building Co Pty Ltd v May [1977] HCA 17
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…7 (Dixon CJ) ( ‘Maxwell ’); Fisher v Hebburn Ltd (1960) 105 CLR 188, 194 (Fullagar J) (‘ Fisher ’); Geraldton Building Co Pty Ltd v May (1977) 136 CLR 379. [5]Fullagar J in Fisher, 194.…
Fisher v Hebburn Ltd [1960] HCA 80
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…ents which occurred before its commencement’.[5] [4] Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261, 267 (Dixon CJ) ( ‘Maxwell ’); Fisher v Hebburn Ltd (1960) 105 CLR 188, 194 (Fullagar J) (‘ Fisher ’); Geraldton Building Co Pty Ltd v May (1977) 136 CLR 379. [5]Fullagar J in Fisher, 194.…
Maxwell v Murphy [1957] HCA 7
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…esults. In other words it attaches ‘new legal consequences to facts, or events which occurred before its commencement’.[5] [4] Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261, 267 (Dixon CJ) ( ‘Maxwell ’); Fisher v Hebburn Ltd (1960) 105 CLR 188, 194 (Fullagar J) (‘ Fisher ’); Geraldton Building Co Pty Ltd v May (1977) 136 CLR 3…
Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] VSC 406
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…he proceeding otherwise be dismissed. The only remaining dispute in this case is in relation to costs. [1] Jane v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd & Anor [2013] VSC 406 (‘Judgment’). I will assume familiarity with the Judgment. Defined terms bear the same meaning.…
Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] VSC 399
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…findings made by the Court, I do not consider that in all the circumstances I should exercise my discretion in favour of awarding indemnity costs. [8][2012] VSC 399 (‘ Sunland ’).…
Aljade and MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…nalysis, a point made by counsel for Bob Jane.[7] [7]Reference was made to the decision of Redlich J (as his Honour then was) in Aljade & MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351, [36]-[37].…

AI Chat coming soon