FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Irwin v Irwin [2016] FCA 1565
Appeal from: Irwin v Irwin [2016] FCCA 1767 File number: SAD 202 of 2016 Judge: CHARLESWORTH J Date of judgment: 7 December 2016 Date of publication of reasons 22 December 2016 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — case management principles — relevance and application of s 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to the exercise of discretionary power to dismiss an appeal other than on its merits
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — dismissal of appeal for failure by appellant to attend at a hearing relating to the appeal — where appellant’s conduct evidenced a disruptive attitude —where appellant unwilling to discharge obligations under s 37N of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – risk of non-attendance on hearing of substantive appeal unacceptable
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — appropriate use of email communications between a party to proceedings and an associate of a presiding judge – orders prohibiting email communications with associate
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 25(2B), 37M, 37N
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 9.61, 11.01, 36.01, Div 9.6
Date of hearing: 7 December 2016 Registry: South Australia Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 64 Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Ower SC with Mr Selly Solicitor for the Respondent: Iles Selly Lawyers ORDERS
SAD 202 of 2016 BETWEEN: CAMPBELL CREAGHE IRWIN
Appellant
AND: ANGUS WILLIAM IRWIN
Respondent
JUDGE:
CHARLESWORTH J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 DECEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37P(3)(f) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the requirements in r 36.74(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) are waived in relation to the respondent’s application for an order that the appeal be dismissed.
2.The appeal is dismissed.
3.The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the appeal.
4.The appellant has leave to inspect, but not to copy, the transcript of today’s hearing in the South Australia District Registry of the Court.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Charlesworth J:
INTRODUCTION
Section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (Act) confers power upon a single judge to make an order that an appeal to the Court be dismissed for failure of the appellant to attend a hearing relating to the appeal. On 7 December 2016, I dismissed this appeal in the exercise of that power. I delivered brief oral reasons with a view to publishing written reasons at a later time. These are my written reasons.
SUMMARY OF REASONS
There were two hearings relating to this appeal at which the appellant either did not attend or attended only in part. The first was a case management hearing on 4 October 2016 during which the appellant departed the Court abruptly at a…
Continue reading Irwin v Irwin
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Irwin v Irwin [2016] FCA 1565
- Case
- [2016] FCA 1565
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were the relevance and application of section 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to the exercise of discretionary power to dismiss an appeal other than on its merits, and the appropriate use of email communications between a party to proceedings and an associate of a presiding judge. The court had to determine whether the appellant's actions warranted dismissal of the appeal and whether any communication between the appellant and the judge's associate should be permitted.
The court found that the appellant's conduct demonstrated a disruptive attitude and an unwillingness to comply with court obligations, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The court also determined that the use of email communications between the appellant and the judge's associate was inappropriate and issued orders prohibiting such communications. The court concluded that the appellant's failure to attend the hearing and his conduct warranted the dismissal of the appeal, and that the orders prohibiting email communications were necessary to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
The court made several orders in relation to the appeal. The requirements in rule 36.74(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) were waived in relation to the respondent's application for an order that the appeal be dismissed. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal. The appellant was also granted leave to inspect, but not to copy, the transcript of the hearing. Additionally, orders were made prohibiting email communications between the appellant and the judge's associate.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 37P(3)(f) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the requirements in r 36.74(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) are waived in relation to the respondent’s application for an order that the appeal be dismissed.
2. The appeal is dismissed.
3. The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the appeal.
4. The appellant has leave to inspect, but not to copy, the transcript of today’s hearing in the South Australia District Registry of the Court.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.