Ippin Textiles Pty Ltd v Winau Aust Pty Ltd

Case [2021] NSWCA 9


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Ippin Textiles Pty Ltd v Winau Aust Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 9
Hearing dates: 29 October 2020
Date of orders: 12 February 2021
Decision date: 12 February 2021
Before: Macfarlan JA at [1];
Leeming JA at [48];
Brereton JA at [80]
Decision:

(1) Grant leave to appeal.

(2) Direct the applicants within 14 days to file and serve a Notice of Appeal in the form of the draft Notice of Appeal provided to the Court.

(3) Dismiss the appeal with costs.

Catchwords:

LAND LAW – Torrens title – indefeasibility of title – fraudster procured execution and registration of mortgages purportedly on behalf of mortgagor – whether mortgages properly construed secure anything against the lands

LAND LAW – Torrens title – indefeasibility of title – effect of acknowledgment of receipt of payment in registered mortgage – acknowledgment prima facie evidence of receipt but must yield to the facts as proved – no advance actually made to mortgagor due to intervention of fraudster

LAND LAW – Torrens title – indefeasibility of title – whether an unregistered document can be incorporated by reference into a registered mortgage – existence of Special Condition in registered mortgage excluding unregistered document where void – unregistered document void due to fraud

Legislation Cited:

Real Property Act 1886 (SA), s 69

Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 36(11), 41, 42, 57

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A

Cases Cited:

Black v S Freedman & Company (1910) 12 CLR 105; [1910] HCA 58

Breskvar v Wall (1971) 126 CLR 376; [1971] HCA 70

Bursill Enterprises Pty Ltd v Berger Bros Trading Co Pty Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 73; [1971] HCA 9

Deguisa v Lynn [2020] HCA 39; 94 ALJR 1020

English Scottish and Australian Bank Ltd v Phillips (1937) 57 CLR 302; [1937] HCA 6

Fistar v Riverwood Legion and Community Club Ltd (2016) 91 NSWLR 732; [2016] NSWCA 81

Gibb v Registrar of Titles (Vic) (1940) 63 CLR 503; [1940] HCA 15

Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd v Vella [2011] NSWCA 390; 16 BPR 30,189

Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2020] HCA 29; 94 ALJR 818

Partridge v McIntosh and Sons Ltd (1933) 49 CLR 453; [1933] HCA 38

Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Cox [2014] NSWCA 328; 17 BPR 33,313

Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v English [2010] NSWCA 32; 14 BPR 27,339

Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Tsai [2004] NSWSC 745

Petersen v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91; [1951] HCA 57

Printy v Provident Capital Ltd [2007] NSWSC 287; 13 BPR 24,603

PT Ltd v Maradona Pty Ltd (1992) 25 NSWLR 643

Registrar-General of New South Wales v Cihan [2012] NSWCA 297; 16 BPR 30,845

Small v Tomassetti [2001] NSWSC 1112; 12 BPR 22,253

Vella v Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 505;

Continue reading Ippin Textiles Pty Ltd v Winau Aust Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Ippin Textiles Pty Ltd v Winau Aust Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 9
Case
[2021] NSWCA 9
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in *Ippin Textiles Pty Ltd v Winau Aust Pty Ltd* concerned the validity of registered mortgages over land held under the Torrens system. The applicant, Ippin Textiles Pty Ltd, sought to appeal a decision concerning these mortgages, which had been procured by a fraudster who purported to act on behalf of the mortgagor. The appeal was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the registered mortgages, despite being executed and registered due to fraud, could properly be construed to secure anything against the mortgagor's land. Further, the Court had to determine the legal effect of an acknowledgment of receipt of payment within a registered mortgage, and whether an unregistered document could be incorporated by reference into a registered mortgage, particularly where the registered mortgage contained a special condition excluding unregistered documents found to be void.

The Court reasoned that while an acknowledgment of receipt of payment in a registered mortgage is prima facie evidence of receipt, this presumption yields to the facts as proved. In this instance, no advance was actually made to the mortgagor due to the fraudster's intervention. The Court also considered the incorporation of unregistered documents, finding that a special condition within the registered mortgage explicitly excluded such incorporation where the unregistered document was void. As the unregistered document in question was void due to fraud, it could not be incorporated into the registered mortgage.

Ultimately, the Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal but then dismissed the appeal with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Grant leave to appeal.

(2) Direct the applicants within 14 days to file and serve a Notice of Appeal in the form of the draft Notice of Appeal provided to the Court.

(3) Dismiss the appeal with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.