Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd v Young

Case

[2017] FCCA 468

23 March 2017


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd v Young [2017] FCCA 468 [2017] FCCA 468 23 March 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This decision concerns applications for special leave to appeal before Dowdy J. The applicant, Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd, sought special leave to appeal in relation to two separate decisions, Young v Hones and Young v King, and a further judgment by Bromwich J. The core of the dispute revolved around the applicant's perceived dissatisfaction with the reasons provided in these judgments and the prospects of success for special leave applications.

The legal issues before the court were whether the applications for special leave to appeal had merit and arguable grounds, and whether they could satisfy the stringent criteria for reopening a special leave hearing. Specifically, the court was required to consider the nature of special leave applications, the discretion involved in granting or refusing them, and the circumstances under which a prior decision on special leave could be revisited.

Dowdy J, applying established principles regarding special leave applications, noted that the High Court is not obliged to provide detailed reasons for its decisions on such matters. The court referenced statements from *Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Aust) Ltd v Commonwealth* and *Coulter v The Queen*, highlighting that special leave applications are a mechanism for filtering appellate work and involve a wide judicial discretion that can be exercised without extensive reasons. The judge found the proposed special leave applications in *Young v Hones* and *Young v King* to be wholly lacking in merit and without reasonable prospects of success, as they did not present genuine and arguable grounds. Furthermore, the judge determined that the proposed special leave application concerning Bromwich J's judgment, which was apparently criticised for a breach of the "duty to give reasons of a certain kind," was also doomed to failure, as the judgment was considered detailed and reasoned.

The court concluded that the applications for special leave to appeal were without merit and had no reasonable prospects of success.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Breach

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

3

Cases Cited

26

Statutory Material Cited

3

Young v Hones (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 499