Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 309
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No Q2001/711
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION ) Re KENNETH HEARD Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Dr E K Christie, Member Date4 April 2003
PlaceBrisbane
Decision The decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereto, the Tribunal decides that Mr Heard is entitled to pension payable at the Special Rate.
(Sgd) Dr E K Christie
Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS – disability pension – whether applicant entitled to special rate – whether applicant totally and permanently incapacitated – whether applicant prevented from continuing to undertake remunerative work by reason of war-caused incapacity alone – whether accepted service-related conditions ‘substantial cause’ of inability to engage in remunerative work
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 ss 19, 24, 120
Forbes v Repatriation Commission (2000) 101 FCR 50
Flentjar v Repatriation Commission (1997) 48 ALD 1Re Starcevich and Repatriation Commission (1986) 10 ALN 202
Re Doyle and Repatriation Commission (1986) 47 ALD 187
Jackman v Repatriation Commission [1997] FCA 564
Cavell v Repatriation Commission (1988) 9 AAR 534
Re Hornery and Repatriation Commission [1998] AATA 602
Rendell v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1881
Re Bonner and Repatriation Commission (1989) 17 ALD 680
Byrne v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1134
Fox v Repatriation Commission (1997) 45 ALD 317
REASONS FOR DECISION
4 April 2003 Dr E K Christie, Member 1. This is an application by Kenneth Heard for a review of the following decisions:
(a)A decision by a Delegate of the Repatriation Commission dated 30 June 2000 which accepted the condition of post traumatic stress disorder as being service related and increased disability pension to 100% to the general rate;
(b)A further decision by a Delegate of the Repatriation Commission dated 26 October 2000 which determined that the conditions of localised osteoarthrosis of the left hip and localised osteoarthrosis of the left ankle were not service related; and
(c)On 19 July 2001 the Veteran’s Review Board affirmed the decisions.
2. At the hearing, Mr A Harding of Counsel represented Mr Heard. The respondent was represented by Mr J Kelly, a Departmental Advocate.
3. The Tribunal had before it documents lodged pursuant to section 37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (the ‘T’ documents) and the various documents tendered by the parties.
4. Oral evidence on behalf of the applicant was given by Mr Kenneth Heard himself and Dr P Kar, a psychiatrist. The respondent called no witnesses.
Facts
5. Kenneth Heard was born in 1938 and served with the Australian Army from 26 April 1955 until discharge on 26 April 1980, having reached the prescribed retiring age.
6. During his service Mr Heard rendered operational service in the Malaysia region from 21 September 1965 until 14 September 1966 and in South Vietnam from 1 October 1969 until 25 January 1970.
7. Mr Heard also rendered eligible defence from 7 December 1972 until 26 April 1980.
8. Mr Heard had the following conditions accepted as “service…
Continue reading Heard and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Heard and Repatriation Commission [2003] AATA 309
- Case
- [2003] AATA 309
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included determining whether Heard was totally and permanently incapacitated, whether his incapacity was solely due to his war-caused conditions, and whether those conditions were a substantial cause of his inability to engage in remunerative work. The court needed to interpret and apply relevant provisions of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, including sections 19, 24, and 120, in the context of previous case law.
The court found that Heard's war-caused conditions were a substantial cause of his inability to engage in remunerative work, and that he was totally and permanently incapacitated. The court held that the Tribunal had erred in its approach to assessing the applicant's incapacity and had not given proper weight to the medical evidence. The court concluded that Heard was entitled to the special rate disability pension, and set aside the decision of the Tribunal, substituting a decision that Heard was entitled to the pension at the Special Rate.
The final orders of the court were that the decision under review was set aside and in substitution thereto, the Tribunal decided that Mr Heard was entitled to pension payable at the Special Rate.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereto, the Tribunal decides that Mr Heard is entitled to pension payable at the Special Rate.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.