Hatherall and Repatriation Commission

Case [2003] AATA 83


Administrative

Appeals

Tribunal

 

DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 83

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL      )

)          No N2000/477

VETERANS' APPEALS  DIVISION )
Re KATHLEEN JEAN HATHERALL

Applicant

And

REPATRIATION COMMISSION

Respondent

DECISION

Tribunal Senior Member M D Allen

Date31 January 2003

PlaceSydney

Decision

This matter is remitted to the Respondent with the direction that in accordance with the Tribunal's decision of 11 February 2002 the Applicant Kathleen Jean Hatherall is entitled to pension at the Special Rate pursuant to section 24 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (as amended) as and from today's date.

(Sgd)        M. D. ALLEN

..................................           
  Senior Member

CATCHWORDS

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS - Application for special rate pension - Whether incapacity permanent - Permanent means for the foreseeable future not forever.

Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 - s24A

McDonald v Director General Social Security 1 FCR 354

Jebb v Repatriation Commission 80 ALR 329

REASONS FOR DECISION

31 January 2003  Senior Member M D Allen

1.      On 11 February 2002 the Tribunal made a decision in this matter in the following terms, namely:

"The decisions under review are set aside and the Tribunal substitutes in lieu thereof its decision namely THAT the Applicant, Kathleen Jean Hatherall, is entitled to payment of pension for the defence-caused diseases of osteoarthritis right knee, adjustment disorder with depressed mood and lumbar spondylosis as and from 19 July 1998 AND THAT the assessment of the rate of pension to be paid is adjourned to the 1st day of July 2002 with payment to the Applicant as and from the 19th day of July 1998 to the 30th day of June 2002 at the Temporarily Totally and Permanently Incapacitated rate as set forth in section 25 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (as amended)."

2.      At paragraph 62 of the reasons for decisions I said:

"…The Tribunal's intention is that following it's finding that the Applicant is entitled to pension at the Special Rate that this matter be adjourned until the 1st of July 2002. In the interim the Applicant is granted a pension pursuant to section 25 of the VEA, that is to say at the temporarily totally incapacitated rate. If in that time steps can be taken by the Respondent to undertake rehabilitation for the applicant and place he in one of the clerical positions which it argued she could fulfil, than the matter can be reassessed. If the Applicant is on 1st July 2002 still unable to engage in remunerative work, she will be entitled to pension at the Special Rate unless some other matters intervene."

3.      In conformity with the above decision and the reasons for it on 11 July 2002 a directions hearing was held. At that directions hearing the Respondent appeared by Counsel Miss R Henderson, instructed by the Commonwealth Crown Solicitors Office.

4.      During discussion of the matter Miss Henderson stated:

"Belatedly we have been trying to make contact with the Applicant to talk to her about a suitable rehabilitation plan…

Continue reading Hatherall and Repatriation Commission

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Hatherall and Repatriation Commission [2003] AATA 83
Case
[2003] AATA 83
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Hatherall and Repatriation Commission involves Kathleen Jean Hatherall, the applicant, who sought a special rate pension under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. The dispute arose as to whether her incapacity was permanent, a crucial factor in determining her eligibility for the pension. This matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia.

The legal issues before the court were centered on the interpretation of the term "permanent incapacity" as it appears in section 24A of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether "permanent" meant forever or if it could refer to a condition that is permanent for the foreseeable future. The court was also required to consider relevant precedents, including McDonald v Director General Social Security and Jebb v Repatriation Commission, to aid in its interpretation.

The court found that the term "permanent" should be interpreted as meaning permanent for the foreseeable future rather than forever. This conclusion was reached by examining the ordinary meaning of the word, the context in which it was used, and the purpose of the legislation. The court noted that the term "permanent" in other sections of the Act had been interpreted to mean permanent for the foreseeable future. Therefore, the court held that the applicant's incapacity was indeed permanent for the purposes of the legislation. The matter was remitted to the Repatriation Commission with directions to pay the applicant the special rate pension as per the Tribunal's decision dated 11 February 2002.

Orders

Orders of the court

This matter is remitted to the Respondent with the direction that in accordance with the Tribunal's decision of 11 February 2002 the Applicant Kathleen Jean Hatherall is entitled to pension at the Special Rate pursuant to section 24 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (as amended) as and from today's date.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.