Court of Criminal Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
- Summary available
Medium Neutral Citation: Green, Al v R [2017] NSWCCA 282 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 28 November 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1];
R A Hulme J at [71];
Garling J at [72]Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal with respect to the convictions entered on pleas of guilty.
(2) Dismiss the appeal against the convictions.
(3) Refuse leave to appeal against the aggregate sentence.Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – application for leave to appeal against convictions – convictions based on pleas to sexual assaults committed in 1984 – application to withdraw pleas – refusal to allow applicant to withdraw pleas –whether applicant capable of understanding nature of charges against him at time of pleading – whether applicant intended to enter pleas – whether pleas induced by inappropriate conduct of legal representatives
CRIME – appeal – application for leave to appeal against sentence – sexual assaults committed in 1984 – whether sentence manifestly excessive – whether inappropriate reliance on pre-sentence report – sentencing principles for historical offences – need for sentences to reflect objective seriousness of offendingLegislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 19
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61D, 61I, 90
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5Cases Cited: McIntosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184
Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132; [1995] HCA 41
MPB v R [2013] NSWCCA 213; 234 A Crim R 576
R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368; [2002] NSWCCA 129
Regina v SL [2004] NSWCCA 397
RL v R [2015] NSWCCA 106
Senior v R [2017] NSWCCA 220Category: Principal judgment Parties: Al Green aka Glen Alan Rozynski (Applicant)
Regina (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Applicant self-represented
Ms H Roberts (Respondent)
Applicant self-represented
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2012/275374 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- District Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Criminal
- Date of Decision:
- 2 December 2016
- Before:
- Frearson SC DCJ
- File Number(s):
- 2012/275374
Judgment
-
BASTEN JA: On the night of 13 January 1984 a 17 year old woman alleged she had been sexually assaulted in a car not far from the Hume Highway at Marulan. Although she went immediately to the police, the present applicant was not arrested and charged in relation to the assaults until 3 September 2012. The identification of the applicant resulted from a DNA profile which had been obtained from him and which matched that of semen taken from the complainant’s jumper following the assaults.
-
On 16 September 2013 the applicant entered pleas of guilty to an indictment containing five counts, namely:
(i) detaining the complainant with intent to hold her for an advantage, namely sexual intercourse;
(ii)-(iv) having sexual intercourse with the complainant without her consent and knowing that she had not consented; and
(v) attempting to have sexual intercourse with the complainant without her consent and knowing that she had not consented.
The matter was listed for sentence on 16 January 2014.
-
The applicant…
- AGLC
- Green, Al v The Queen [2017] NSWCCA 282
- Case
- [2017] NSWCCA 282
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether Green was capable of understanding the charges against him at the time of his pleas and whether those pleas were made voluntarily and with an understanding of their consequences. The court found that Green was capable of understanding the charges and that his pleas were voluntary and intentional. The court also examined whether the conduct of Green's legal representatives had any undue influence on his decision to plead guilty and found that there was no inappropriate conduct influencing his pleas. Regarding the sentences, the court assessed whether they were manifestly excessive, taking into account the need for sentences to reflect the objective seriousness of the offences and the appropriate reliance on the pre-sentence report. The court concluded that the sentences were not manifestly excessive and that they appropriately reflected the gravity of the historical offences.
The court dismissed Green's application for leave to appeal against his convictions and sentences. The court found that Green was competent to enter his pleas, that his pleas were voluntary, and that the sentences were appropriate. The court did not find any basis to grant leave to appeal, and therefore, the convictions and sentences stood affirmed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.