Gordon v Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 25 min read

Reported Decision:

62 NSWLR 427

Court of Appeal


CITATION:

GORDON v BEROWRA HOLDINGS PTY LTD [2005] NSWCA 27

HEARING DATE(S):

26 November 2004

 
JUDGMENT DATE: 


28 February 2005

JUDGMENT OF:

Mason P at 1; Sheller JA at 65; Beazley JA at 66

DECISION:

Appeal upheld.

CATCHWORDS:

Workers Compensation Act 1987 - consequences of a breach of s151C - whether proceedings in breach of s151C are a nullity - waiver of right to invoke s151C - Part 19A r3 District Court Rules - leave to withdraw offer of settlement - leave to amend. (D)

LEGISLATION CITED:

Workers Compensation Act 1987

CASES CITED:

Admiralty Commissioners v Valverda (Owners) [1938] AC 173
Baker v Rothmans of Pall Mall (Australia) Ltd (1999) 18 NSWCCR 374
Brown v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 171
Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394
Darrington v Calbeck (1918) 20 NSWLR 212
Deng v GMS Fulfilment Services Ltd (2003) 25 NSWCCR 446
Electricity Commission of New South Wales v Yates (1991) 30 NSWLR 351
Emad Trolley Pty Ltd v Shigar (2003) 57 NSWLR 636
Hill v Bolt (1992) 28 NSWLR 329
Howard v Boddington (1877) 2 PD 203 at 210.
Kammins Ballrooms Co Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd [1971] AC 850
Lewis v Combell Constructions Pty Limited (1989) 18 NSWLR 528
Marshall v D G Sundin & Co Pty Ltd (1990) 16 NSWLR 463
National Mutual Fire Insurance Co Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia [1981] 1 NSWLR 400
Pritchard, In re [1963] Ch 502
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 358
Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146
Rosniak v GIO SC unrep, Wood J, 4 October 1990
Scanruby Pty Ltd v Caltex Petroleum Pty Limited [2001] NSWSC 411
Sydney Ports Corporation v Collins (2003) 56 NSWLR 232
Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW in Court Session & Anor [2004] NSWCA 183
Whiteford v Commonwealth of Australia (1995) 38 NSWLR 100
Young v Combe SC unrep, Hodgson J, 29 July 1993

PARTIES:

Rodney John GORDON v BEROWRA HOLDINGS PTY LTD

FILE NUMBER(S):

CA 40826/03

COUNSEL:

Appellant: J Sexton SC/ P Regattieri
Respondent: M D Williams SC/ P Perry

SOLICITORS:

Appellant: Peacocke Dickens & Price (Dubbo)
Respondent: Lee & Lyons

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:

District Court

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):

DC 233/01 (Dubbo)

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:

Woods ADCJ




                            CA 40826/03

                            MASON P
                            SHELLER JA
                            BEAZLEY JA

                            Monday 28 February 2005
Rodney John GORDON v BEROWRA HOLDINGS PTY LTD

The appellant/plaintiff was injured in the course of his employment with the respondent/defendant. On 23 November 2001 the plaintiff commenced proceedings in the District Court less than two months after giving written notice of injury to the defendant. This was in contravention of s151C(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, which provides that a person is not entitled to commence court proceedings against an employer liable to pay compensation under the Act until six months have elapsed since notice of injury was…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Gordon v Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2005] NSWCA 27
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Gordon (the appellant) brought proceedings against Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd (the respondent) in the District Court of New South Wales. The dispute concerned a claim for workers' compensation. The appellant sought to withdraw an offer of settlement and amend his statement of claim. The respondent sought to rely on section 151C of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW) to argue that the proceedings were a nullity.

The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether proceedings commenced in breach of section 151C of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* were a nullity, whether the respondent had waived its right to invoke section 151C, and whether the appellant should be granted leave to withdraw his offer of settlement and amend his statement of claim.

The Court of Appeal held that a breach of section 151C did not render proceedings a nullity. The Court reasoned that the provision was intended to protect the rights of insurers and that a failure to comply with it did not automatically extinguish the jurisdiction of the court. Furthermore, the Court found that the respondent had waived its right to rely on section 151C by its conduct in the proceedings. The Court also granted the appellant leave to withdraw his offer of settlement and amend his statement of claim, finding that it was in the interests of justice to do so.

The appeal was upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal upheld.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.