Goodridge and Beadle and Ors

Link copied
Case Copied 55 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GOODRIDGE & BEADLE AND ORS [2019] FamCA 709
FAMILY LAW – EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES – rule 15.71 of the Family Law Rules – whether an abuse of process – whether examinations should be stayed – held, no abuse, no stay.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 60, 116
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 596A
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 128
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 4(1), 34, 69ZP(1), 69ZQ(1)(c), 69ZX(1)(e), 78, 79, 90SM, 92, 106,
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 15.71
Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 39
Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 (Vic)
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), pt 7AA
An v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 160 FCR 480
Baker v The Queen (2004) 223 CLR 513
Barbaro v Director of Public Prosecutions [2004] VSC 404
Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75
BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958
Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] HCA 42
Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186
Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254
CSJ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 328 FLR 431
Dietrich v R (1992) 177 CLR 292
Director of Public Prosecutions v Humphrys [1977] AC 1
Faden & Faden (No 3) [2011] FamCA 897
Gilding v Eyre (1861) 142 ER 584
Goldsmith v Sperrings Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 478
Goodridge & Beadle (2017) 57 Fam LR 425; [2017] FCCA 3219
Grainger v Hill (1838) 132 ER 769
Griffiths v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 372
Guildford Industries Ltd v Hankinson Services Ltd (1973) 40 DLR (3d) 398
Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 156 ER 145
Haoucher v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1990) 169 CLR 648
Hasim & Ors v Attorney General (Cth) (2013) 218 FCR 25
Hatcher v Cohn & Ors (2004) 139 FCR 425
Hatton v Attorney-General(Cth) (2000) 26 Fam LR 570
Ho v Professional Services Review Committee No 295 [2007] FCA 388
In the Marriage of Alexander (1982) 8 Fam LR 289
In the Marriage of Nieuwstraten (1987) 11 Fam LR 681
In the Marriage of Sahari (1976) 2 Fam LR 11,126
In the Marriage of Smit & Pickworth (1981) 7 Fam LR 387
Jago v District Court of New South Wales (1989) 168 CLR 23
Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550
Maan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 179 FCR 581
Martin & Martin (No 4) [2014] FamCA 442
Martin & Martin (No 5) [2014] FamCA 954
Medlow & Medlow [2017] FamCAFC 159
Metall und Rohstoff AG v Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc [1990] 1 QB 391
Metropolitan Bank Ltd v Pooley (1885) 10 AC 210
New South Wales v Canellis (1994) 181 CLR 309
Platt v Ong [1972] VR 197
Prough v Entriken (1849) 11 PA 81
R v Derby Magistrates’ Court; ex parte Brooks (1984) 80 Cr App R 164
R v Kelly (Attorney General’s Reference No 53 of 1998) [2000] 1 QB 198
R…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Goodridge and Beadle and Ors and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] FamCA 709
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned applications brought by Ms Goodridge and Mr Goodridge before Justice Wilson. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the orders indicate that both parties had made applications in separate cases, dated 23 and 24 September 2019 respectively, which were dismissed by the court. The proceedings also involved examinations ordered on 15 July 2019, with a further hearing scheduled for 6 April 2020.

The court was required to determine the fate of the applications made by Ms Goodridge and Mr Goodridge, and to make orders regarding the ongoing examinations and the production of documents. The court also needed to address the issue of costs.

Justice Wilson dismissed all applications advanced by Ms Goodridge and Mr Goodridge in their respective cases. The court ordered that both Ms Goodridge and Mr Goodridge comply forthwith with previous orders made on 5 June 2019 and 15 July 2019 concerning the production of documents. A further hearing for the examinations ordered on 15 July 2019 was fixed for 6 April 2020. Leave was granted to both Ms Goodridge and Mr Goodridge to make viva voce submissions on 1 October 2019. Costs were reserved, and parties were to file written submissions as to costs by 18 October 2019. Each party was granted liberty to apply generally.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Ms Goodridge has leave to make viva voce submissions to the court on 1 October 2019.

2.

All applications advanced in her application in a case dated 23 September 2019 are dismissed.

3.

Mr Goodridge has leave to make viva voce submissions to the court on 1 October 2019.

4.

All applications advanced in his application in a case dated 24 September 2019 are dismissed.

5.

The further hearing of the examinations ordered pursuant to my orders made on 15 July 2019 is fixed for one day on 6 April 2020 at 10am.

6.

Forthwith, Ms Goodridge and Mr Goodridge comply with my orders made on 5 June 2019 and 15 July 2019 in relation to the production of documents.

7.

Costs are reserved.

8.

Certify for all counsel.

9.

On or before 4pm on 18 October 2019 any party seeking to do so is to file and serve written submissions as to costs.

10.

Each party has liberty to apply generally.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.