Girrawheen Tavern v Joseph

Link copied
Case Copied 35 min read

GIRRAWHEEN TAVERN -v- JOSEPH [2003] WASCA 244



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2003] WASCA 244
THE FULL COURT (WA)
Case No:FUL:81/200117 MARCH 2003
Coram:PARKER J
WHEELER J
MCKECHNIE J
14/10/03
22Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Appeal dismissed
B
PDF Version
Parties:GIRRAWHEEN TAVERN
CHRISTOPHER ANANIAS JOSEPH

Catchwords:

Workers Compensation
Disability
Degree of disability
Aggravation of separate work related injuries
Workers Compensation
Disability
Whether permanent

Legislation:

Law Reform (Contributory Negligence and Tortfeasers' Contribution) Act 1947
Workers' Compensation & Rehabilitation Act 1981, s 93D

Case References:

Chestone Holdings Pty Ltd v Garbelini, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 980584; 19 October 1999
Franklins Self Serve Pty Ltd v Wyber [1999] NSWCA 390; (1999) 48 NSWLR 249
Hewitt v Benale Pty Ltd [2002] WASCA 163; [2002] ACLR 450
Lu v Mediterranean Shoes Pty Ltd [2000] 1 VR 511; [2000] VSCA 65
Petkovski v Galletti [1994] 1 VR 436
Re A Medical Assessment Panel; Ex parte Ansett Australia Ltd, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 980364; 26 June 1998
Re Monger; Ex parte Dutch [2001] WASCA 220. ,
Re Monger; ex parte United Construction Pty Ltd [2002] WASCA 253
Re Skirving; Ex parte Forward, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 980737; 18 December 1998
Stockman v Argyle Diamond Sales Ltd [2002] WASCA 89

Bushby v Morris [1980] 1 NSWLR 81
Co­operative Bulk Handling Ltd v Taylor, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 960528; 17 September 1996
McComish v Fydelor (1994) 12 SR (WA) 4
Morris v George [1977] 2 NSWLR 552
Re Gillett; Ex parte Rusich [2001] WASCA 111
White v Order of the Servants of Mary (Inc) (1995) 13 SR (WA) 214

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : THE FULL COURT (WA) CITATION : GIRRAWHEEN TAVERN -v- JOSEPH [2003] WASCA 244 CORAM : PARKER J
    WHEELER J
    MCKECHNIE J
HEARD : 17 MARCH 2003 DELIVERED : 14 OCTOBER 2003 FILE NO/S : FUL 81 of 2001 BETWEEN : GIRRAWHEEN TAVERN
    Applicant

    AND

    CHRISTOPHER ANANIAS JOSEPH
    Respondent



Catchwords:

Workers Compensation - Disability - Degree of disability - Aggravation of separate work related injuries



Workers Compensation - Disability - Whether permanent


Legislation:

Law Reform (Contributory Negligence and Tortfeasers' Contribution) Act 1947


Workers' Compensation & Rehabilitation Act 1981, s 93D

(Page 2)

Result:

Appeal dismissed




Category: B


Representation:


Counsel:


    Applicant : Mr J R Ludlow
    Respondent : Mr M R Pearson


Solicitors:

    Applicant : McAuliffe Williams & Partners
    Respondent : Friedman Lurie Singh



Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Chestone Holdings Pty Ltd v Garbelini, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 980584; 19 October 1999.
Franklins Self Serve Pty Ltd v Wyber [1999] NSWCA 390; (1999) 48 NSWLR 249.
Hewitt v Benale Pty Ltd [2002] WASCA 163; [2002] ACLR 450.
Lu v Mediterranean Shoes Pty Ltd [2000] 1 VR 511; [2000] VSCA 65.
Petkovski v Galletti [1994] 1 VR 436.
Re…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Girrawheen Tavern v Joseph and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2003] WASCA 244
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Girrawheen Tavern appealed against a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board in relation to an employee, Joseph, who had suffered multiple work-related injuries. The key issue was the degree of Joseph's disability and whether the injuries had resulted in a permanent impairment. The Board had found that Joseph's disability was permanent and total, a finding that the Girrawheen Tavern contested.

The Girrawheen Tavern argued that Joseph's disability was not as severe as found by the Board, and that his injuries were not permanent. The court had to determine whether the Board's finding was supported by the evidence and whether the Girrawheen Tavern had acted reasonably in managing Joseph's injuries. The Girrawheen Tavern submitted that the Board had erred in law and failed to consider the relevant evidence.

The court found that the Board had properly considered the evidence and applied the correct legal principles. The Girrawheen Tavern had not demonstrated that the Board's findings were unreasonable or that there was an error of law. The court held that Joseph's disability was indeed permanent and total, and dismissed the Girrawheen Tavern's appeal. The Girrawheen Tavern was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.