Reported Decision: [2000] 19 NSWCCR 720
New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: GIO General Limited v ABB Installation & Service Pty Limited & Ors [2000] NSWCA 118 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40253/98 HEARING DATE(S): 22/03/2000 JUDGMENT DATE:
10 May 2000PARTIES :
GIO General Limited
ABB Installation & Service Pty Limited
GIO Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited
MMI Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited
TGI Australia LimitedJUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Beazley JA at 1; Heydon JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Dust Diseases Tribunal LOWER COURT
FILE NUMBER(S) :47/96 LOWER COURT
JUDICIAL OFFICER :Curtis J
COUNSEL: Appellant: J McIntyre SC
First Respondent: B Ferrari
Second Respondent: G Little
Third Respondent: B Hughes
Fourth Respondent: J D Hislop QCSOLICITORS: Appellant: Hunt & Hunt
First Respondent: Gillis Delaney Brown
Second Respondent: GIO Australia Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited
Third Respondent: A O Ellison & Co
Fourth Respondent: Moray & AgnewCATCHWORDS: Workers Compensation - Dust Diseases - Employment to the nature of which the disease was due - s 151AB of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW)
Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW)CASES CITED: CIC Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Alcan Australia Ltd 91994) 35 NSWLR 169
CIC Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Kellogg (Australia) Pty Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 422
MMI Insurance Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Baker (1997) 41 NSWLR 289
FAI Traders Insurance Co Ltd v HIH Winterthur Workers Compensation (NSW) Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 257
Tame v Commonwealth Collieries Pty Ltd (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 269
Smith v Mann (1932) 47 CLR 426
Blayney Shire Council v Lobley (1995) 12 NSWCCR 52
Commonwealth v Bourne (1960) 104 CLR 32
Bryer v Metropolitan Water Sewerage & Drainage Board (1939) 39 SR (NSW) 321
R v City of Westminster Assessment Committee [1941] 1 KB 53DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs; Cross-appeal dismissed
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40253/98
CL 47/96MASON P
BEAZLEY JA
HEYDON JAWednesday, 10 May 2000
GIO GENERAL LIMITED v ABB INSTALLATION & SERVICE PTY LIMITED & ORS
FACTSThe first respondent (ABB) had cross-claimed against the insurers on risk during the period of a claim made by the plaintiff against the respondent for damages for injury (the disease of mesothelioma) suffered by him as a result of negligent exposure to asbestos whilst in ABB’s employ. The plaintiff’s claim was made in respect of the period 1969 to 1993. The trial judge found that the plaintiff had been negligently exposed during the period 1966 to 1969. The fourth respondent (TGI) was on risk at that time. The trial judge left open the question whether ABB was liable for any period after 1969.
On the hearing of the cross-appeal the trial judge held that the plaintiff was last in an employment of the nature of which his disease was due in December 1986. The appellant (GIO General) was the insurer on risk at this time and was held liable…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read GIO General Ltd v ABB Installation and Service Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2000] NSWCA 118
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the employer's employment of the worker was "to the nature of which the disease was due" within the meaning of section 151AB(1) of the Act. This required the Court to determine if the worker's employment with ABB Installation and Service Pty Ltd was a contributing factor to the development of his dust disease, and if so, whether that employment was the *cause* of the disease.
The Court analysed the evidence regarding the worker's exposure to dust during his employment with ABB Installation and Service Pty Ltd. It applied the principles established in previous case law concerning the causal link required between employment and a dust disease for an employer to be liable for indemnity. The Court found that the worker's employment was indeed to the nature of which the disease was due, establishing the necessary causal connection.
Consequently, the Court of Appeal dismissed GIO General Ltd's appeal with costs and also dismissed ABB Installation and Service Pty Ltd's cross-appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal dismissed with costs; Cross-appeal dismissed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.