FREW -v- DONATE LIFE (N.M.A.H.S) [2014] WADC 96

Jurisdiction:	DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA	Citation No:	[2014] WADC 96
Case No:	APP:21/2014	Heard:	12 MAY 2014
Coram:	DERRICK DCJ	Delivered:	4/08/14
Location:	PERTH
No of pages:	34	Judgment Part:	1 of 1
Result:	Leave to appeal granted Appeal allowed
PDF Version

Parties:	SUSAN FREW DONATE LIFE (N.M.A.H.S)
Catchwords:	Workers' Compensation Appeal from Workers' Compensation Arbitration Service Appeal against finding of period of total incapacity Requirements of rules of natural justice Whether appeal involves a question of law
Legislation:	Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Act 1981 (WA) Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Regulations 1982 Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Arbitration Rules 2011
Case References:	Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Agostini [No 2] [2009] WASCA 231 Atanasoska v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd [2009] WASCA 17 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd v Brady [2008] WASCA 250 Cameron v Cole [1944] HCA 5; (1944) 68 CLR 571 Catholic Education Office of WA v Granitto [2012] WASCA 266 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 1074; (1994) 49 FCR 576 Glennan v Commissioner of Taxation [2003] HCA 31; (2003) 77 ALJR 1195 Hoskins v Van Den-Braak (1998) 43 NSWLR 290 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 National Companies and Securities Commission v The News Corporation Limited [1984] HCA 29; (1984) 156 CLR 296 Neill v Nott [1994] HCA 23; (1994) 121 ALR 148 Pacific Industrial Co v Jakovljevic [2008] WASCA 60 Paridis v Settlement Agents Supervisory Board [2007] WASCA 97 Re Burton; Ex parte Lowe [2003] WASCA 306 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme [2003] HCA 56; (2003) 216 CLR 212 Taylor v Taylor [1979] HCA 38; (1979) 143 CLR 1

JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

IN CIVIL

LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : FREW -v- DONATE LIFE (N.M.A.H.S) [2014] WADC 96 CORAM : DERRICK DCJ HEARD : 12 MAY 2014 DELIVERED : 4 AUGUST 2014 FILE NO/S : APP 21 of 2014 BETWEEN : SUSAN FREW

Appellant

AND

DONATE LIFE (N.M.A.H.S)

Respondent

ON APPEAL FROM:

Jurisdiction : WORKERS' COMPENSATION ARBITRATION SERVICE (WA)

Coram : ARBITRATOR RUTHERFORD

Citation : A2941

Catchwords:

Workers' Compensation - Appeal from Workers' Compensation Arbitration Service - Appeal against finding of period of total incapacity - Requirements of rules of natural justice - Whether appeal involves a question of law

Legislation:

Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Act 1981 (WA)

Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Regulations 1982
Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Arbitration Rules 2011

Result:

Leave to appeal granted

Appeal allowed

Representation:

Counsel:

Appellant : Mr G T Stubbs

Respondent : Mr M J Thickett

Solicitors:

Appellant : Peter J Griffin & Co

Respondent : HWL Ebsworth Lawyers

Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Apache…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Frew v Donate Life (N.M.A.H.S) and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2014] WADC 96
Decision Date: 4 AUGUST 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Frew v Donate Life (N.M.A.H.S), the dispute was between Frew, an employee, and Donate Life, his former employer. The conflict arose after Frew was injured at work and claimed a period of total incapacity under the workers' compensation scheme. The Workers' Compensation Arbitration Service determined that Frew's claim was not substantiated, leading to an appeal by Frew to the court. The central issue was whether the appeal should be allowed under the applicable rules and if the appeal involved a question of law.

The court examined the requirements of natural justice and the process followed by the Workers' Compensation Arbitration Service. It considered whether the decision-making process was fair and whether Frew had an adequate opportunity to present his case. The court also evaluated whether the appeal involved a question of law that warranted judicial review. Ultimately, the court found that the appeal involved a question of law and that the principles of natural justice had not been adequately observed in the original decision.

As a result, the court granted leave to appeal and allowed the appeal. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring that all parties in workers' compensation matters receive fair treatment and that decisions are made in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The outcome was that Frew's appeal was successful, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration in light of the court's findings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Leave to appeal granted

Appeal allowed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.