FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| EMERSON & FOSTER & ANOR | [2019] FCCA 2774 |
| Catchwords: CHILD SUPPORT – Application seeking judicial review of child support decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – question of law – departure order based on financial resources available to the Appellant – legal error found – appeal upheld. |
| Legislation: Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth), ss.98C(1)(b), 117(2), 117(4) 117(6), 117(7) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s.44AAA |
| Applicant: | MR EMERSON |
| First Respondent: | MS FOSTER |
| Second Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| File Number: | MLG 2878 of 2018 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Bender |
| Hearing date: | 20 June 2019 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 20 June 2019 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 1 October 2019 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Self-represented |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Not applicable |
| Counsel for the First Respondent: | No appearance |
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Not applicable |
| Counsel for the Second Respondent: | Ms Nicholson |
| Solicitors for the Second Respondent: | Sparke Helmore |
ORDERS
The Notice of Appeal filed by the Appellant on 25 September 2018 and the Amended Notice of Appeal filed on 18 December 2018 be allowed.
The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Social Services and Child Support Division) made 20 August 2018 and released 24 August 2018 be set aside and the matter be remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Social Services and Child Support Division) for rehearing.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Emerson & Foster & Anor is approved pursuant to s.110X(4)(h) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLG 2878 of 2018
| MR EMERSON |
Applicant
And
| MR FOSTER |
First Respondent
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Social Services and Child Support Division) (“the Tribunal”) made 20 August 2018 and released 24 August 2018. The Tribunal set aside the decision under review and substituted a decision that:
·From 4 November 2016 to 31 December 2019 Mr Emerson’s adjusted taxable income is varied to $51,844.00;
·From 1 January 2017 the annual rate payable by Mr Emerson is increased by $3,088.00;
·From 1 January 2018 the annual rate payable by Mr Emerson is increased by $3,182.00;
·From 1 January 2019 until 31 December 2019 the annual rate payable by Mr Emerson is increased by $3,365.00.
The Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal on 25 September 2018.
With the leave of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Emerson and Foster and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] FCCA 2774
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had erred in its determination. The court was required to consider the grounds of appeal raised by Emerson and Foster against the Tribunal's decision.
The court allowed the Notice of Appeal and the Amended Notice of Appeal. Consequently, the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a rehearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Notice of Appeal filed by the Appellant on 25 September 2018 and the Amended Notice of Appeal filed on 18 December 2018 be allowed.
2.
The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Social Services and Child Support Division) made 20 August 2018 and released 24 August 2018 be set aside and the matter be remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Social Services and Child Support Division) for rehearing.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.