Bond v Child Support Registrar & Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 61 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BOND v CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & ANOR [2018] FCCA 422
Catchwords:
CHILD SUPPORT – Application seeking judicial review of child support decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – question of law – departure order made on basis of financial resource attributable to one parent – financial resource consists of monies paid to parent by his father – sum characterised as a loan by payee and not financial resource – legal error – allegation of breach of principles of natural justice – procedural unfairness – no legal error found – appeal dismissed.

Legislation:

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, ss.4, 4(2), 2S, 43(1), pt.6A, 98B, 98C, 117(2)

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, ss.44AAA, 33, 66
Family Law Act 1975, s.117
Federal Circuit Court Rules2001, rr.21.02(1), 21.10

Cases cited:
Humphries & Berry (SSAT Appeal) [2008] FMCA 409
Walker & Fielding (SSAT Appeal) [2010] FMCAfam 320
Henriques & Hatzis (SSAT Appeal) [2014] FCCA 1194
Collector of Customs v Pressure Tankers Pty Ltd and Pozzolanic Enterprise Pty Ltd [1993] 43 FCR 280
Apthorpe v Repatriation Commission (1987) 13 ALD 656
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323
Htun v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244
LDME & JMA [2007] FMCAfam 712
Child Support Registrar & Crabbe and Anor [2014] FamCAFC 10
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Al Miahi (2001) 65 ALD 141
Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Ling [1996] 185 CLR 259
S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473
Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v Li (2013) 297 ALR 225
SZUWX v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCA 1389
Hall & Hall [2016] HCA 23
In the marriage of Kelly and Kelly (No 2) (1981) FLC ¶91-108 at 76,803.
Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407
Applicant: MR BOND
First Respondent: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
Second Respondent: MS BOND
File Number: ADG 115 of 2017
Judgment of: Judge Brown
Hearing date: 22 August 2017
Date of Last Submission: 22 August 2017
Delivered at: Adelaide
Delivered on: 23 February 2018

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Horvat
Solicitors for the Applicant: DW Fox Tucker Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr Bishop
Counsel for the Second Respondent: In person
Solicitors for the First Respondent: Miles Oakley

ORDERS

  1. The notice of appeal filed on 27 March 2017 is dismissed.

  2. The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $5,000.00.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Bond v Child Support Registrar & Anor is approved pursuant to s.110X(4)(h) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT ADELAIDE

ADG 115 of 2017

MR BOND

Applicant

And

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

First Respondent

MS BOND

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This is an appeal, from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal,[1] in respect of a…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Bond v Child Support Registrar & Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCCA 422
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Bond, appealed a decision of the Child Support Registrar to the Federal Circuit Court. The dispute concerned the Registrar's decision regarding child support payments.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Registrar's decision was correct and ought to be upheld, or if it should be set aside and remitted for reconsideration.

Judge Brown dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the Registrar's decision. The Court ordered that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $5,000.00.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The notice of appeal filed on 27 March 2017 is dismissed.

2.

The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $5,000.00.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.