Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Woldesilassie v The Queen
[2018] VSCA 285
Citation 1
(Para 27)
…d to that offending. In the absence of such connection, the drugs could not be seen to aggravate the conduct, which caused the serious injury.[10] [9][2018] VSCA 285. [10]Ibid, [31].…
-
Stephens v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 121
Citation 2
(Para 23)
…conduct.[5] [3] McBride v The Queen (1966) 115 CLR 44, 72 per Barwick CJ. [4] Jiminez v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 572, 579. [5] Stephens v DPP (2016) 50 VR 740, [21].…
-
DPP v Neethling
[2009] VSCA 116
Citation 3
(Para 26)
…ngs or evading police – these latter features, including erratic driving, I do not find present in the relevant time beyond reasonable doubt.[8] [6](2009) 22 VR 466. [7](2016) 50 VR 740. [8] R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252.…
-
R v Whyte
[2006] NSWCCA 75
Citation 4
(Para 26)
…ing erratic driving, I do not find present in the relevant time beyond reasonable doubt.[8] [6](2009) 22 VR 466. [7](2016) 50 VR 740. [8] R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252.…
-
Jiminez v the Queen
[1992] HCA 14
Citation 5
(Para 23)
…The notion encompasses a very wide range of conduct.[5] [3] McBride v The Queen (1966) 115 CLR 44, 72 per Barwick CJ. [4] Jiminez v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 572, 579. [5] Stephens v DPP (2016) 50 VR 740, [21].…
-
McBride v the Queen
[1966] HCA 22
Citation 6
(Para 23)
…y on occasion drive with less than due care and attention.[4] The notion encompasses a very wide range of conduct.[5] [3] McBride v The Queen (1966) 115 CLR 44, 72 per Barwick CJ. [4] Jiminez v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 572, 579. [5] Stephens v DPP (2016) 50 VR 740, [21].…