Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Macarthur

Director of Public Prosecutions v Macarthur

Case [2018] VCC 851

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Macarthur [2018] VCC 851
Case: [2018] VCC 851
Decision Date: 1 June 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Macarthur [2018] VCC 851

Most Recent Citation

DPP v Macarthur [2019] VSCA 71

Cases Citing This Decision

DPP v Macarthur [2019] VSCA 71
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…that the respondent’s conduct, after leaving the tram, and following the victim, was ‘brazen, predatory and unwanted’.[3] [1] DPP v Macarthur [2018] VCC 851 (‘Reasons’). [2]Reasons [42], [72]. [3]Reasons [46].…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Shrestha v The Queen [2017] VSCA 364
Citation 1

…e gravity of that offence and the moral culpability of the offender. [8] Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41. [9] [2017] VSCA 364. 83There are factors that distinguish your case from Shrestha , insofar as you entered a plea of guilty at an early time whereas in that case, the se…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41
Citation 2

…eflect the objective gravity of that offence and the moral culpability of the offender. [8] Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41. [9] [2017] VSCA 364. 83There are factors that distinguish your case from Shrestha , insofar as you entered a plea of guilty at an early time whereas…
Schneider v The Queen [2016] VSCA 76
Citation 3

…Cases Cited: Guden v R (2010) 28 VR 288 and Konamala v R [2016] VSCA 48 at paragraphs [35] to [36]; Schneider v R [2016] VSCA 76; Da Costa Junior v R [2016] VSCA 49; Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192; R H McL v The Queen (2000) CLR 452 Sentence: ---…
Konamala v The Queen [2016] VSCA 48
Citation 4

…Cases Cited: Guden v R (2010) 28 VR 288 and Konamala v R [2016] VSCA 48 at paragraphs [35] to [36]; Schneider v R [2016] VSCA 76; Da Costa Junior v R [2016] VSCA 49; Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192; R H McL v The Queen (2000) CLR 452 Sentence: ---…
Da Costa v The Queen [2016] VSCA 49
Citation 5

…Cases Cited: Guden v R (2010) 28 VR 288 and Konamala v R [2016] VSCA 48 at paragraphs [35] to [36]; Schneider v R [2016] VSCA 76; Da Costa Junior v R [2016] VSCA 49; Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192; R H McL v The Queen (2000) CLR 452 Sentence: ---…
Bowden v The Queen [2013] VSCA 382
Citation 6

…hat I must apply the tests set out in the case of Bowden v The Queen ,[10] and the enquiry to make a registration order is a two-staged process. [10] [2013] VSCA 382. 104I am satisfied, as a sentencing court, that the conditions for the making of such an order are present - namely, that you have pleaded guilty to…
Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
Citation 7

…R 288 and Konamala v R [2016] VSCA 48 at paragraphs [35] to [36]; Schneider v R [2016] VSCA 76; Da Costa Junior v R [2016] VSCA 49; Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192; R H McL v The Queen (2000) CLR 452 Sentence: ---…
Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196
Citation 8

…Cases Cited: Guden v R (2010) 28 VR 288 and Konamala v R [2016] VSCA 48 at paragraphs [35] to [36]; Schneider v R [2016] VSCA 76; Da Costa Junior v R [2016] VSCA 49; Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192; R H McL v The Queen (2000) CLR 452 Sentence: ---…
MCL v The Queen [2000] HCATrans 108
Citation 9

…2016] VSCA 48 at paragraphs [35] to [36]; Schneider v R [2016] VSCA 76; Da Costa Junior v R [2016] VSCA 49; Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192; R H McL v The Queen (2000) CLR 452 Sentence: ---…

AI Chat coming soon