Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dedalus (a pseudonym)

Director of Public Prosecutions v Dedalus (a pseudonym)

Case [2023] VCC 131

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Dedalus (a pseudonym) [2023] VCC 131
Case: [2023] VCC 131
Decision Date: 8 February 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Dedalus (a pseudonym) [2023] VCC 131

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Callahan (a pseudonym) [2025] VCC 136

Cases Citing This Decision

Director of Public Prosecutions v Callahan (a pseudonym) [2025] VCC 136
Citation 1

…17] VSCA 330 --- Stalio v The Queen (2012) 46 VR 426 --- The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48 --- Director of Public Prosecutions v Dedalus (a pseudonym) [2023] VCC 131 --- Weir (a pseudonym) v The King [2023] VSCA 113 --- Crawford (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2018] VSCA 113 --- DPP v Polat (a pseudonym) [2020] VSCA 174…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

DPP v Tullipan (a pseudonym) [2021] VSCA 191
Citation 1

…. Cases Cited: Scannell v The Queen [2014] VSCA 330; Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385; DPP v Tullipan [2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H McL v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1319; [2000] HCA 46; R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416. Sentenc…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41
Citation 2 (Para 83)

…ses ‘may inform the task of sentencing’, they offer only limited assistance to a sentencing court.[42] [42] DPP v Dalgliesh (2017) 91 ALJR 1063 at [83].…
DPP v O'Neill [2015] VSCA 325
Citation 3 (Para 59)

…ntiary basis for moderating your moral culpability or the need for deterrence.[28] [28] Psychological Report [105]; see generally DPP v O’Neill [2015] VSCA 325 at [59] & [74]. 57However, I accept Ms Cidoni’s assessment that your ‘profound mental illness generates intensely painful feelings of anxiety, distress, dy…
Scannell v The Queen [2014] VSCA 330
Citation 4

…cing practices’ Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1958 (Vic.); Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic.), s 5(2F). Cases Cited: Scannell v The Queen [2014] VSCA 330; Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385; DPP v Tullipan [2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H…
Stalio v The Queen [2012] VSCA 120
Citation 5

…4] VSCA 330; Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385; DPP v Tullipan [2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H McL v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1319; [2000] HCA 46; R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416. Sentence: 5 years and 6 months’ imprisonment; 3…
R v AMP [2010] VSCA 48
Citation 6

…2001) 209 CLR 1; R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385; DPP v Tullipan [2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H McL v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1319; [2000] HCA 46; R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416. Sentence: 5 years and 6 months’ imprisonment; 3 years and 9 months non-parole p…
DPP v TY (No 2) [2009] VSCA 226
Citation 7 (Para 78)

…proper exercise of my sentencing discretion. [23] R v Chen (1993) 66 A Crim R 154, [174]-[175]. [24] Director of Public Prosecutions v TY [2009] VSCA 226 at [78]. [25] Ibid, [82]. 52The retrial occurred due to no fault of your own, and you have unquestionably been burdened by the strain of considerable uncertainty…
Cheung v The Queen [2001] HCA 67
Citation 8

…rimes Act 1958 (Vic.); Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic.), s 5(2F). Cases Cited: Scannell v The Queen [2014] VSCA 330; Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385; DPP v Tullipan [2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H McL v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1319;…
R H McL v The Queen [2000] HCA 46
Citation 9

…[2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H McL v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1319; [2000] HCA 46; R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416. Sentence: 5 years and 6 months’ imprisonment; 3 years and 9 months non-parole period.…
MCL v The Queen [2000] HCATrans 108
Citation 10

…WEF [1998] 2 VR 385; DPP v Tullipan [2021] VSCA 191; Stalio v The Queen – [2012] VSCA 120; The Queen v AMP [2010] VSCA 48; R H McL v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1319; [2000] HCA 46; R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416. Sentence: 5 years and 6 months’ imprisonment; 3 years and 9 months non-parole period.…

AI Chat coming soon