-
Swee Yen Tay v Migration Review Tribunal
[2009] FCA 515
Citation 1
…53; Minister for Natural Resources v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council (1987) 9 NSWLR 154; Swee & Yen Tay v Migration Review Tribunal (2009) 178 FCR 1…
-
Daniels v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[2007] SASC 114
Citation 2
…ure Rules 2018 (Vic), Rule 8.08; Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s39; Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), Schedule 1 Cases Cited: Daniels v DCT [2007] SASC 114; DCT v Levick (1999) 168 ALR 383 at 392; Dooney v Henry (2000) 174 ALR 41; Garrett v Foster’s Wine Estates Limited [2007] FCA 253; Minister for Natural Resou…
-
Garrett v Foster's Wine Estates Limited
[2007] FCA 253
Citation 3
…ls v DCT [2007] SASC 114; DCT v Levick (1999) 168 ALR 383 at 392; Dooney v Henry (2000) 174 ALR 41; Garrett v Foster’s Wine Estates Limited [2007] FCA 253; Minister for Natural Resources v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council (1987) 9 NSWLR 154; Swee & Yen Tay v Migration Review Tribunal (2009) 178 FCR 1…
-
Hill v Woollahra Municipal Council
[2003] NSWCA 106
Citation 4
…74 ALR 41; Garrett v Foster’s Wine Estates Limited [2007] FCA 253; Minister for Natural Resources v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council (1987) 9 NSWLR 154; Swee & Yen Tay v Migration Review Tribunal (2009) 178 FCR 1…
-
Dooney v Henry
[2000] HCA 44
Citation 5
…Administration Act 1953 (Cth), Schedule 1 Cases Cited: Daniels v DCT [2007] SASC 114; DCT v Levick (1999) 168 ALR 383 at 392; Dooney v Henry (2000) 174 ALR 41; Garrett v Foster’s Wine Estates Limited [2007] FCA 253; Minister for Natural Resources v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council (1987) 9 NSWLR 154; Swee &…
-
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Levick
[1999] FCA 1580
Citation 6
…8; Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s39; Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), Schedule 1 Cases Cited: Daniels v DCT [2007] SASC 114; DCT v Levick (1999) 168 ALR 383 at 392; Dooney v Henry (2000) 174 ALR 41; Garrett v Foster’s Wine Estates Limited [2007] FCA 253; Minister for Natural Resources v New South Wales Aboriginal…
-
Flaherty v Girgis
[1987] HCA 17
Citation 7
…n J, unreported, 1 November 1993); Tallerman and Co. Pty Ltd v Nathan’s Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93 at 107-8; Flaherty v Grigis (1987) 162 CLR 574.…
-
Re Dymond
[1959] HCA 22
Citation 8
…[20]See for example Moore v Commonwealth (1951) 82 CLR 547 at 576; Re Dymond (1959) 101 CLR 11; FCT v Munro (1926) 38 CLR 153.…
-
Moore v The Commonwealth
[1958] HCA 53
Citation 9
…[20]See for example Moore v Commonwealth (1951) 82 CLR 547 at 576; Re Dymond (1959) 101 CLR 11; FCT v Munro (1926) 38 CLR 153.…
-
Tallerman & Co Pty ltd v Nathan's Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd
[1957] HCA 10
Citation 10
…Wine Co Pty Ltd v Austflavour Pty Ltd (Hedigan J, unreported, 1 November 1993); Tallerman and Co. Pty Ltd v Nathan’s Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93 at 107-8; Flaherty v Grigis (1987) 162 CLR 574.…
-
R v Brewer
[1942] HCA 33
Citation 11
…a public office is presumed to have been validly appointed to that office: M'Gahey v Alston (1836) 2 M & W 206 at 211; 150 ER 731 at 733; R v Brewer (1942) 66 CLR 535 at 548; Hardess v Beaumont [1953] VLR 315 at 318-319. And a council which must form an opinion as to whether there will be any detriment upon the gra…
-
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Munro
[1926] HCA 58
Citation 12
…[20]See for example Moore v Commonwealth (1951) 82 CLR 547 at 576; Re Dymond (1959) 101 CLR 11; FCT v Munro (1926) 38 CLR 153.…
-
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Buzadzic
[2019] VSC 141
Citation 13
(Para 38)
…ir the curial function ” or “ reduce the judicial function of fact finding to the merest formality ” within the meaning of DCT v Buzadzic [2019] VSC 141 at [38]-[39]. Nevertheless, in view of that decision and the lack of argument on its effect, I have not relied upon any of the conclusive evidence provisions in…
-
Annesley v Westpac Banking Corporation
[2016] VSC 323
Citation 14
(Para 68)
…[14] Annesley v Westpac [2016] VSC 323 at [68]-[69], per Derham AsJ.…
-
Permanent Custodians Ltd v Virgin Investments Pty Ltd
[2009] VSC 429
Citation 15
…hat this may have been an attempt to re-agitate an argument previously made and rejected in Permanent Custodians Ltd v Virgin Investments Pty Ltd [2009] VSC 429, I agree with Forrest J that “it does not warrant any further attention”.[22]…