Darren John McCarthy v Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Darren John McCarthy v Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 311
Hearing dates:5 September 2011
Decision date: 27 September 2011
Before: Basten JA at [1]
Meagher JA at [11]
Handley AJA at [51]
Decision:

Appeal dismissed with costs.

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Catchwords: WORKERS COMPENSATION - appeal against decision of Deputy President - limited to decisions in point of law - whether there was a misapplication of s 40 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 - whether there was evidence to support the Deputy President's finding - whether there was a failure to give adequate reasons - whether there was a denial of procedural fairness in making a determination on the papers - no error in point of law.
Legislation Cited: Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998
Workers Compensation Act 1987
Workers Compensation Act 1926
Cases Cited: Australian Wheat Board v Pantaleo (1984) 3 NSWLR 530
Ayoub v AMP Bank Ltd [2011] NSWCA 263
Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139
Cage Developments Pty Ltd trading as Monaro Mix Specified Concrete v Schubert (1981) 2 NSWLR 227
Fletcher International Exports Pty Ltd v Lott [2010] NSWCA 63
Hancock v East Coast Timber Products Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 11
Hill v Bryant (1974) 2 NSWLR 423
JC Ludowici & Son Ltd v Cutri (1992) 26 NSWLR 580
Johnston v Commissioner for Railways (1973) 128 CLR 632
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705
Mitchell v Central West Health Service [1997] 14 NSWCCR 526
Singh v Taj (Sydney) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 330
Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247
South Western Sydney Area Health Service v Edmonds [2007] NSWCA 16
State Transit Authority of New South Wales v Chemler [2007] NSWCA 249
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Darren John McCarthy (Appellant)
Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Ltd (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
B McManamey (Appellant)
L King SC; M Batten (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Turner Freeman (Appellant)
David Veasey (Respondent)
File Number(s):CA 2010/328617
 Decision under appeal 
Citation:
McCarthy v Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Limited [2010] NSWWCCPD 96
Date of Decision:
2010-09-08 00:00:00
Before:
Deputy President Roche
File Number(s):
WCC 2010/2085

Judgment

  1. BASTEN JA : The appellant, Darren John McCarthy, is aggrieved by a decision of Deputy President Roche of the Workers Compensation Commission, in point of law. He has exercised his right of appeal pursuant to s 353 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) ("the Workplace Injury Act "). The appeal concerns a decision not to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Darren John McCarthy v Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] NSWCA 311
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Darren John McCarthy v Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Ltd*, the appellant, Mr. McCarthy, appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against a decision of a Deputy President of the Workers Compensation Commission. The appeal was limited to questions of law.

The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the Deputy President had misapplied section 40 of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW), whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Deputy President's findings, whether the Deputy President had failed to provide adequate reasons for the decision, and whether there had been a denial of procedural fairness by making a determination on the papers.

The Court of Appeal found no error of law in the Deputy President's decision. The court concluded that the Deputy President had not misapplied section 40 of the Act, that there was evidence to support the findings made, that adequate reasons were provided, and that the determination on the papers did not constitute a denial of procedural fairness.

Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed with costs.

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.