Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
Case
•
[2014] FWCD 6659
•24 October 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2014] FWCD 6659
[2014] FWCD 6659
24 October 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involves the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and a complaint made by a CEPU member regarding the validity of alterations to the CEPU's rules. The member claimed that the alterations were not validly approved by the CEPU's National Council and that the poll results of the decision made by correspondence had not been circulated. The Fair Work Commission was required to decide whether the alterations had been made under the rules of the CEPU. The central issue was whether the National Council had validly made the alterations to the rules of the CEPU in a decision made by correspondence. The court found that the alterations were validly made by the National Council as a majority of members of National Council from each Division must be available and have an opportunity to lodge a vote on the relevant proposition or motion within the prescribed time. The court certified the alterations under subsection 159(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Alteration of Organisation Rules
-
Decision by Correspondence
-
Quorum Requirements
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2015] FWCD 3710
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Ken Hardisty v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
[2015] FWCFB 960
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Purcell v Electricity Commission of New South Wales
[1985] HCA 54
Conquo v Jackson
[2009] FCA 45