FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Conquo v Jackson [2009] FCA 45
CORRIGENDUM
DONNA MARGUERITE CONQUO v JEFF JACKSON
VID 33 of 2009
SUNDBERG J
5 FEBRUARY 2009 (CORRIGENDUM 5 FEBRUARY 2009)
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VID 33 of 2009
BETWEEN: DONNA MARGUERITE CONQUO
ApplicantAND: JEFF JACKSON
Respondent
JUDGE:
SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER:
5 FEBRUARY 2009
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
CORRIGENDUM
1. On page 6 paragraph 20 of the Reasons for Judgment, delete the words “present at the meeting” in the second sentence.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Sundberg. Associate:
Dated: 5 February 2009
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Conquo v Jackson [2009] FCA 45
DONNA MARGUERITE CONQUO v JEFF JACKSON
VID 33 of 2009
SUNDBERG J
5 FEBRUARY 2009
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VID 33 of 2009
BETWEEN: DONNA MARGUERITE CONQUO
ApplicantAND: JEFF JACKSON
Respondent
JUDGE:
SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER:
5 FEBRUARY 2009
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Until the final determination of the proceeding or further order the respondent perform and observe the rules of the Health Services Union (the rules):
(a)by ceasing and refraining, by himself, his servants or agents, from obstructing, hindering or in any other way preventing Pitcher Partners, auditors, from carrying out an examination and preparing a report on any irregularities in the financial affairs of the Victoria No 1 Branch (the Branch) of the Health Services Union in accordance with the resolutions of the Branch Committee of the Branch made on 7 January 2009 (the resolutions), and
(b)by providing to Pitcher Partners full access to the records of the Branch in accordance with the resolutions.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VID 33 of 2009
BETWEEN: DONNA MARGUERITE CONQUO
ApplicantAND: JEFF JACKSON
Respondent
JUDGE:
SUNDBERG J
DATE:
5 FEBRUARY 2009
PLACE:
MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND
On 20 January 2009 the applicant obtained an order that the respondent show cause why orders under s 164 of Schedule 1 of the Workplace Relations Act1996 (the Act) should not be made for the performance by him of the rules of the Health Services Union (Union). The proceeding relates to resolutions passed by the Branch Committee of the Victoria No 1 Branch that there be an independent investigation into allegations regarding misuse of Branch funds. The respondent, who is Secretary of the Branch, has declined to co‑operate with the investigation. The applicant is the Junior Vice‑President of the Branch.
The central events leading up to the proceeding are as follows. On 19 December 2008, Sonya McCormack, the Senior Vice‑President of the Branch, acting as President because of the suspension of the President, Pauline Fegan, called a…
Continue reading Conquo v Jackson
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Conquo v Jackson [2009] FCA 45
- Case
- [2009] FCA 45
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether it should grant the relief sought. In considering this, the court gave regard to the relevant union rules, the resolutions of the Branch Committee, and the conduct of the parties. The court noted that the applicants had standing to seek the orders, and that the resolutions of the Branch Committee were binding on all members of the Branch.
The court found that the applicants were entitled to the relief sought. The court held that the union rules and Branch Committee resolutions required the respondents to allow the audit to proceed. The court found that the conduct of the respondents in obstructing the audit was inconsistent with those rules and resolutions. The court found that the applicants would suffer irreparable harm if the relief was not granted.
The court made orders preventing the respondents from interfering with the audit of the Branch's finances. The orders required the respondents to allow Pitcher Partners, the auditors, to examine the Branch's records and prepare a report on any irregularities. The orders were to remain in place until the final determination of the proceeding or further order.
Orders
Orders of the court
Until the final determination of the proceeding or further order the respondent perform and observe the rules of the Health Services Union (the rules):
(a) by ceasing and refraining, by himself, his servants or agents, from obstructing, hindering or in any other way preventing Pitcher Partners, auditors, from carrying out an examination and preparing a report on any irregularities in the financial affairs of the Victoria No 1 Branch (the Branch) of the Health Services Union in accordance with the resolutions of the Branch Committee of the Branch made on 7 January 2009 (the resolutions), and
(b) by providing to Pitcher Partners full access to the records of the Branch in accordance with the resolutions.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: SUNDBERG J
Full text does not contain this section.