Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Case [2015] FWCD 5299


[2015] FWCD 5299

DECISION

Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009
s.159—Alteration of other rules of organisation

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

(R2015/66)

MR ENRIGHT MELBOURNE, 6 AUGUST 2015
Alteration of other rules of organisation.

[1]        On 30 March 2015, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information,

Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) lodged with the Fair Work

Commission (Commission) a notice and declaration setting out particulars of alterations to the

rules of the Electrical, Energy and Services Division of the CEPU – Section B (the Divisional

Rules).

[2]        The particulars set out an alteration to rule 20 of the Divisional Rules.

[3]        The substance of the alteration has previously been set out in notices of particulars

lodged by the CEPU on 17 April 2014 in matter R2014/82 and on 13 March 2015 in matter

R2015/54.

1

[4] As set out in my decision of 7 July 2015, I formally refused to certify the alterations

in matter R2015/54 on the basis of my finding that the alteration had not been validly made.

In that decision, I also detailed the passage of the alteration in matter R2014/82 which

2

culminated in the decision of a Full Bench of the Commission quashing my decision of 24

3

October 2014 certifying it.

[5]        The declaration of Mr Allen Hicks, National Secretary, made on 30 March 2015 and

contained within the notice of particulars in accordance with regulation 126(2) of the Fair

Work (Registered Organisations) Regulations 2009 provides that the National Council made

the alterations in a decision by correspondence voting process with a return date of 27 March

2015. Crucially, Mr Hicks states that, in accordance with rules 7.7 and 7.11 of the rules of

CEPU – Section A, each of three Divisions of the CEPU was represented by a majority of its

National Councillors.

[6]        On the information contained in the notice, including the declaration of Mr Hicks, I

am satisfied the alterations have been validly made under the rules of the organisation.

[7] Given my decision of 7 July 2015 formally refusing to certify the alteration in matter

R2015/54, I can now proceed to certify the alteration in the current matter.
[2015] FWCD 5299

[8]        In my opinion, the alterations comply with and are not contrary to the Fair Work

(Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards and enterprise

agreements, and are not otherwise contrary to law. I certify accordingly under subsection

159(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.

DELEGATE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER

Endnotes:

1

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

[2015] FWCD 3710.

2

Hardisty v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia [2015] FWCFB 960

3

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

[2014] FWCD 6659

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR570115>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2015] FWCD 5299
Case
[2015] FWCD 5299
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) sought certification from the Fair Work Commission for alterations to the rules of its Electrical, Energy and Services Division of Section B. The dispute centred around the validity of a rule change, specifically rule 20, which had previously been refused certification in a separate matter (R2015/54) due to procedural concerns. The CEPU lodged a new notice on 30 March 2015, asserting that the alterations were validly made through a correspondence voting process.

The central legal issue was whether the CEPU had complied with its internal rules when making the alterations to rule 20. The court needed to determine if the alterations were procedurally sound and if they adhered to the requirements of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. This included assessing whether the alterations were contrary to any relevant laws or awards.

In reviewing the matter, the court considered the declaration by Mr Allen Hicks, the National Secretary of CEPU, who stated that the alterations were made following the correct procedures, with each of the three divisions represented by a majority of its National Councillors. The court was satisfied that the alterations were validly made under the CEPU's internal rules. Given the procedural correctness and the absence of any legal contradictions, the court certified the alterations under subsection 159(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.

The court concluded that the alterations to rule 20 were compliant with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards, and enterprise agreements, and were not otherwise contrary to law. Consequently, the alterations were certified, and the CEPU's Divisional Rules were updated accordingly.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.