Legal Research
Cases
Colegrove v Dullaghan

Colegrove v Dullaghan

Case [2016] NSWSC 1105 12 August 2016

Wills

Testamentary Instruments

Validity of Wills

Succession Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

Supreme Court

New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Colegrove v Dullaghan [2016] NSWSC 1105
Hearing dates: 25 – 26 July 2016
Date of orders: 12 August 2016
Decision date: 12 August 2016
Jurisdiction: Equity
Before: Robb J
Decision:
See pars 106 and 107

Catchwords: WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION – testamentary instruments – deceased left behind a 1989 will and a 2010 informal document – informal document witnessed by only one witness – whether the informal document purports to state the deceased’s testamentary intentions in accordance with the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 8 – consideration of circumstances in which the document was executed – held deceased and beneficiary had a very close relationship – held plaintiff and her witnesses were credible witnesses – held the informal document is a valid will and testament of the deceased – letter of administration granted to the plaintiff
Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Application of Brown, Estate of Springfield (1991) 23 NSWLR 535
Newman v Brinkgreve; Estate of Verzijden [2013] NSWSC 371
Tobin v Ezekiel [2012] NSWCA 285; (2012) 83 NSWLR 757
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Jennifer Anne Colegrove (plaintiff)
Toula Dullaghan (defendant)
Representation:
Counsel: L Ellison SC/B Narula (plaintiff)
S Bell   (defendant)
Solicitors:
Hilton King Lawyers (plaintiff)
Websters Solicitors (defendant)

File Number(s): 2015/276114
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

Introduction

By summons filed on 28 September 2015, the plaintiff, Ms Jennifer Anne Colegrove, seeks the following relief concerning a document signed by the late Mr Peter Paskalis on 16 July 2010 (which I will call the “2010 will”):

1. A declaration that the informal testamentary document signed by Peter Paskalis, witnessed by Greg Woods and dated 16 July 2010 (“the 2010 Will”) is a valid Will within the meaning of the Succession Act 2006, s 8.
2.   Letters of Administration with the 2010 Will attached be granted to Jennifer Anne Colegrove, the sole beneficiary named therein.
3.   The proceedings be referred to the Registrar to complete the grant in accordance with the Rules.
4.   Indemnity costs.

The defendant is Ms Toula Dullaghan, who was the sister of Mr Paskalis.
Mr Paskalis died on 23 August 2015, aged 59 years.
On 3 August 1989, Mr Paskalis made a will (which I will call the “1989 will”) the operative parts of which were:

I Hereby revoke all Wills heretofore made by me, and declare this to be my last Will and Testament. I appoint ANNA PULST (MOTHER) of 27 SOPHIE St DUNDAS to be the Executrix and Trustee of this my Will
I Give Devise and Bequeath
All property real, or personal which I possess to my mother absolutely but if she shall not survive me then I appoint my sister TULA (sic) DULLAGHAN of 7 ORION PLC, LILYDALE MELBOURNE VIC as my executrix and I give devise and bequeath all my said property to her absolutely.

This will was made on a printed form. The name and address of the executrix and all of the…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Colegrove v Dullaghan

Details

AGLC: Colegrove v Dullaghan [2016] NSWSC 1105
Case: [2016] NSWSC 1105
Decision Date: 12 August 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Colegrove v Dullaghan involved a dispute over the estate of a deceased person. The plaintiff, Colegrove, claimed to be the rightful beneficiary of the deceased's estate, based on an informal document she alleged represented the deceased's testamentary intentions. The defendant, Dullaghan, contested the validity of the informal document and argued that the deceased's 1989 will should be upheld instead. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the informal document executed by the deceased could be considered a valid will under section 8 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The court had to consider whether the informal document was signed by the deceased in the presence of a witness, and whether the circumstances in which the document was executed supported the conclusion that it represented the deceased's testamentary intentions. Additionally, the court needed to assess the credibility of the witnesses for both parties and determine the appropriate course of action regarding the administration of the deceased's estate.

The court found that the informal document was indeed a valid testamentary instrument. It noted that the deceased and the plaintiff had a very close relationship, which supported the conclusion that the deceased's testamentary intentions were accurately reflected in the informal document. The court also found the plaintiff and her witnesses to be credible, while the defendant's witnesses were not as reliable. Given these findings, the court concluded that the informal document was a valid expression of the deceased's testamentary intentions and granted the plaintiff a letter of administration. This decision allowed the plaintiff to proceed with the administration of the deceased's estate according to the terms of the informal document.

Orders