Reported Decision: 105 LGERA 370
New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: CODLEA PTY LTD v BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL [1999] NSWCA 399 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40005/99 HEARING DATE(S): 30 September 1999 JUDGMENT DATE:
28 October 1999PARTIES :
Codlea Pty Ltd v Byron Shire CouncilJUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Stein JA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Land & Environment Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LEC 10021/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Talbot J
COUNSEL: P Graham QC/D P Wilson (Appellant)
G K Downes QC/P C Tomasetti (Respondent)SOLICITORS: Bolster & Co (Appellant)
Wilshire Webb (Respondent)CATCHWORDS: LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT - appeal to judge from commissioner (refusing development consent for subdivision of land) - application for leave to appeal and appeal heard concurrently, construction of clause contained in Local Environmental Plan, power of Land and Environment Court to utilise s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to give Council's agreement under the Local Environmental Plan ACTS CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 90(1)(a),79C(1)(a)
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 39(2),36(5),56A,57(3)(b)
Land and Environment Court Rules, Pt 13 rr 14, 16
Local Government Act 1993, s 64
Water Supply Authorities Act 1987, Div 2 Pt 3, ss 25, 26, 27CASES CITED: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Newton (1957) 96 CLR 577
Newton v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 98 CLR 1
Kogarah Municipal Council v Kent (1981) 46 LGRA 334
McDougal v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 30 NSWLR 258
North Sydney Municipal Council v P D Mayoh Pty Ltd (1998) 14 NSWLR 746
Strathfield Municipal Council v Drew (1985) 1 NSWLR 338
Sydney City Council v Claude Neon Ltd (1989) 15 NSWLR 724DECISION: Leave to appeal granted on the undertaking of the appellant to pay the filing fee; Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT
Clause 45 provides:
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEALCA 40005/99
LEC 10021/98Thursday, 28 October 1999
HANDLEY JA
SHELLER JA
STEIN JA
CODLEA PTY LIMITED v BYRON SHIRE COUNCILThe appellant lodged a development application with the respondent Council for the subdivision of land at Brunswick Heads, New South Wales, proposing that part of the sewerage generated by the Brunswick Head township be redirected from the Brunswick Head treatment plant to another plant across the Brunswick River by way of a rising main constructed at its expense. The application was refused by the respondent. It was not satisfied that prior adequate arrangements had been made for the provision of sewerage services to the proposed development in accordance with Clause 45 of the Byron Local Environmental Plan 1988 (LEP) and s 90(1)(l) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
That Council shall not consent to the carrying out of development on any land to which this plan provides unless it is satisfied that prior adequate arrangements have been made for the provision of sewerage, drainage and water services to the land.
The appellant appealed to a Commissioner of the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Codlea Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
Details
- Case
- [1999] NSWCA 399
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Codlea Pty Ltd appealed to the New South Wales Court of Appeal against a decision of the Land and Environment Court which refused development consent for a subdivision of land. The appeal was heard concurrently with an application for leave to appeal.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal concerned the construction of a clause within the relevant Local Environmental Plan and the power of the Land and Environment Court to utilise section 39(2) of the *Land and Environment Court Act 1979* to grant a council's agreement under that Local Environmental Plan.
The Court of Appeal considered the meaning and effect of the relevant clause in the Local Environmental Plan and the scope of the Land and Environment Court's powers under section 39(2) of the Act. The Court determined that the Land and Environment Court did not have the power to give the Council's agreement under the Local Environmental Plan in the manner sought by the appellant.
Leave to appeal was granted on the undertaking of the appellant to pay the filing fee, but the appeal itself was dismissed with costs.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal concerned the construction of a clause within the relevant Local Environmental Plan and the power of the Land and Environment Court to utilise section 39(2) of the *Land and Environment Court Act 1979* to grant a council's agreement under that Local Environmental Plan.
The Court of Appeal considered the meaning and effect of the relevant clause in the Local Environmental Plan and the scope of the Land and Environment Court's powers under section 39(2) of the Act. The Court determined that the Land and Environment Court did not have the power to give the Council's agreement under the Local Environmental Plan in the manner sought by the appellant.
Leave to appeal was granted on the undertaking of the appellant to pay the filing fee, but the appeal itself was dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Leave to appeal granted on the undertaking of the appellant to pay the filing fee; Appeal dismissed with costs
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.