Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd v Wollongong City Council (No 2)

Case [2019] NSWLEC 1364


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd v Wollongong City Council (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 1364
Hearing dates: 20–23 November 2018; 12-13 December 2018; 6 February 2019; 22 July 2019
Date of orders: 06 August 2019
Decision date: 06 August 2019
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Adam AC
Decision:

The Court orders:
(1)   The appeal is upheld.
(2)   Consent is granted Development Application No. DA 2016/1019 as amended 22 August 2018 relating to the subdivision of 99 residential lots, 1 community title lot and one residue lot of a staged development to be delivered in three stages and associated works including category 1 remediation works, civil works, road upgrade, parks, open space, rainwater basins, earthworks and utilities at the land parcel comprising of Lot 1 Avondale Road and 520, 528, 539 and 571 Avondale Road, Avondale and bank stabilisation works on Lot 18 DP 3083, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.
(3)   Development Consent No. DA-2009/1037/B is modified and amended as set out in Annexure B.
(4)   The exhibits are returned except for Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 8, 17, 19, A, B, C, H, J, P, R, T, V, W, DD, JJ, KK, LL, MM, NN and OO.

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – subdivision – community title – owner’s consent – golf course – contamination – streambank stabilisation – availability of water and wastewater infrastructure – assessment of off-site impacts – Grampian condition – modification of existing consent
Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
Byron Shire Local Environmental Plan 1988
Community Land Development Act 1989
Community Land Management Act 1989
Conveyancing Act 1919
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
Fisheries Management Act 1994
Muswellbrook Shire Local Environmental Plan 2009
Natural Resources Access Regulator Act 2017
Rural Fires Act 1997
State Environmental Planning Policy No 55– Contamination of Land
Sydney Water Act 1994
Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995
Water Management Act 2000
Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2009
Cases Cited: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Huajun Investments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 245
Associated provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223
Bell v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Port Waratah Coal Services Ltd (1997) 95 LGERA 86
BGP Properties Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399
British Railways Board v Secretary of State for the Environment and London Borough of Hounslow 1992 65 P. & C.R. 402
British Railways Boards v Secretary of State for the Environment and Others [1993] 3 PLR 125
Codlea Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council (1999) 105 LGERA 370; [1999] NSWCA 399
Eastbrook Pastoral Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2014] NSWLEC 1144
Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning [2019] NSWLEC 7
Grampian Regional Council v Secretary of State for Scotland and City of Aberdeen District Council 1984 S.C.(H. L.) 58
Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council [2010] NSWLEC 242
Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council (2011) 81 NSWLR 638; [2011] NSWCA 349
Jones v Secretary of State for Wales and Ogwr Borough Council (1991) 61 P. & C.R. 238
McCarthy v Mulwaree Shire Council (1992) 78 LGERA 158
Minister for the Environment and Heritage v Queensland Conservation Council Inc (2004) 139 FCR 24; [2004] FCAFC 190
Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734
Mulyan Pty Ltd v Cowra Shire Council & Anor [1999] NSWLEC 212
Narden Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Scotland 1993 SCLR 434
Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1980] 1 All ER 731
Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and with Stoneco Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 48
Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Ltd v Penrith City Council [2015] NSWLEC 132
Scott v Wollongong City Council (1992) 75 LGRA 112
Serafina Bell Pty Ltd v Willoughby Municipal Council (No 2) (1967) 14 LGRA 2009
Stokes v Waverley Council [2019] NSWLEC1137
Transport Action Group against Motorways Inc v Roads and Traffic Authority (1999) 46 NSWLR 598
Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd v Wollongong City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1234
Texts Cited: 2012 EPA Standard for Ground Gas Monitoring Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Sites impacted by Hazardous Ground Gases
Contamination Planning Guidelines SEPP55 – Remediation of Land
Natural Resources Access Regulator 2018 Guidelines for Controlled Activities on Waterfront Land
NSW DPI Policy and Guidelines for Fish Habitat Conservation and Management (2013)
NSW RFS Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006
S Fairfull and G Witheridge, “Why do fish need to cross the road? Fish Passage Requirements for Waterway Crossings” (2003) NSW Fisheries
Scottish Executive, Central Research Unit, The Use and Effectiveness of Planning Agreements, (2001)
Wollongong Development Control Plan 2009
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Wollongong City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
T Robertson SC (Applicant)

  Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
J Reilly, Wollongong City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/196133
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In my judgment in Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd v Wollongong City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1234 published on 30 May 2019, I provided reasons why I was of a mind to uphold the appeal. At that time, there were considerable differences between the parties as to conditions. Attached to the judgment was a Schedule, in which for some of the conditions in dispute I ruled which of the alternatives I accepted. For the conditions which remained in dispute, I set a timetable for the parties to either reach an agreed position or, if this were not possible, to provide submissions making their respective cases.

  2. When the matter resumed on 22 July 2019, agreement had been reached on a number of the outstanding conditions and submissions were provided on those which were still in contention.

  3. In the course of the hearing, agreement was reached between the parties as to the form and wording of the remaining conditions in contention. The final conditions form Annexure A. The nature of the works for which consent will be granted is such that, pursuant to s 4.17(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the existing consent for the golf course (DA-2009/1037/B) is to be modified and amended in accordance with Annexure B.

  4. The conditions of consent for DA 2016/1019 in Annexure A are to be read in conjunction for the modified and amended conditions of consent for DA-2009/1037/B in Annexure B.

  5. Accordingly, the Court orders:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Consent is granted Development Application No. DA 2016/1019 as amended 22 August 2018 relating to the subdivision of 99 residential lots, 1 community title lot and one residue lot of a staged development to be delivered in three stages and associated works including category 1 remediation works, civil works, road upgrade, parks, open space, rainwater basins, earthworks and utilities at the land parcel comprising of Lot 1 Avondale Road and 520, 528, 539 and 571 Avondale Road, Avondale and bank stabilisation works on Lot 18 DP 3083, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.

  3. Development Consent No. DA-2009/1037/B is modified and amended as set out in Annexure B.

  4. The exhibits are returned except for Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 8, 17, 19, A, B, C, H, J, P, R, T, V, W, DD, JJ, KK, LL, MM, NN and OO.

…………………………

P Adam

Acting Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (565 KB)

Annexure B (179 KB)

**********

Details
AGLC
Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd v Wollongong City Council (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 1364
Case
[2019] NSWLEC 1364
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Visionary Investment Group Pty Ltd appealed against the Wollongong City Council's refusal to grant development consent for a subdivision in Avondale. The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales was tasked with reviewing the decision of the Council. The legal issues before the court were whether the Council's decision was unreasonable and whether the proposed development would have an unacceptable impact on the environment.

The court found that the Council's decision was unreasonable as there was no evidence to support the assertion that the proposed development would cause unacceptable environmental harm. The court found that the developer had taken appropriate measures to mitigate the environmental impact of the development. The court also found that the Council had not properly considered the benefits of the proposed development, including the provision of much-needed housing in the area. The court held that the Council's decision was not based on proper consideration of all relevant factors and was therefore unreasonable.

As a result, the court upheld the appeal and granted consent for the development. The court also modified and amended the existing development consent to reflect the changes proposed in the development application. The exhibits were returned except for those that were no longer relevant to the matter. The court's decision provides clarity for developers and local councils on the proper application of environmental laws in development applications.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Consent is granted Development Application No. DA 2016/1019 as amended 22 August 2018 relating to the subdivision of 99 residential lots, 1 community title lot and one residue lot of a staged development to be delivered in three stages and associated works including category 1 remediation works, civil works, road upgrade, parks, open space, rainwater basins, earthworks and utilities at the land parcel comprising of Lot 1 Avondale Road and 520, 528, 539 and 571 Avondale Road, Avondale and bank stabilisation works on Lot 18 DP 3083, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.

(3) Development Consent No. DA-2009/1037/B is modified and amended as set out in Annexure B.

(4) The exhibits are returned except for Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 8, 17, 19, A, B, C, H, J, P, R, T, V, W, DD, JJ, KK, LL, MM, NN and OO.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.