Carran & Carran

Case [2022] FedCFamC2F 818


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)

Carran & Carran [2022] FedCFamC2F 818

File number: LNC 804 of 2020
Judgment of: JUDGE TURNBULL
Date of judgment: 24 June 2022
Catchwords:  FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – financial agreement – where financial agreement during marriage made purportedly made under s 90B instead of s 90C – whether financial agreement’s terms are uncertain – whether there has been a material change of circumstances – whether financial agreement is void for uncertainty – whether there was unconscionable conduct
Legislation:  Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 4, 90B(1), 90C(1), 90C(2)(a), 90DA(1A), 90G, 90K(1)(b), 90K(1)(d), 90K(1)(e), 90KA
Cases cited: Beckstead & Beckstead [2021] FedCFamC2F 136
Briginshaw & Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336,
Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337
Cohen v Cohen (1929) 42 CLR 91
Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447
Daily v Daily [2020] FamCAFC 304
DW & GT [2005] FamCA 161
Fewster v Drake [2016] FamCAFC 214
Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420
Frederick v Frederick [2019] FamCAFC 87
Graham v Squibb [2019] FamCAFC 33
Guild v Stasiuk [2020] FamCA 348
Hoult v Hoult [2013] FamCAFC 109
Hsiao v Fazarri (2020) 270 CLR 588
Jones v Padavatton (1969) 2 ER 616
Kaimal & Kaimal [2020] FamCA 971
Kostres & Kostres [2009] FamCAFC 222
Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571
Metropolitan Gas Company v Federated Gas Employees’ Industrial Union (1925) 35 CLR 449
Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 240 CLR 45
Ruane v Bachman-Ruane [2009] FamCA 1101
Saintclaire v Saintclaire [2013] FamCA 491
Senior v Anderson [2011] FamCAFC 129
Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 185
Sindel v Georgiou (1984) 154 CLR 661
Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 6
Sullivan v Sullivan [2011] FamCA 752
Whitford v Whitford [1979] FamCA 3
Division: Division 2 Family Law
Number of paragraphs: 197
Date of last submission: 20 December 2021
Date of hearing: 20-21 September 2021
Place: Heard in Launceston, delivered in Sydney
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Trezise
Solicitor for the Applicant: Ian Guest & Associates
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms C Gibson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Charmaine Gibson Barrister & Solicitor

ORDERS

LNC 804 of 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MS CARRAN

Applicant

AND:

MR CARRAN

First Respondent

B PTY LTD

Second Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE TURNBULL

DATE OF ORDER:

24 JUNE 2022

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.the agreement made between MS CARRAN (‘the Wife’) and MR CARRAN (‘the Husband’), dated 8 December 2006, is set aside under s 90K(1)(b) and (d) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (‘the Act’);

2.the following applications be dismissed:

(a)the Wife’s application at paragraph 3 of the terms of order sought in her application for final orders filed 30 October 2020; and

(b)the Husband…

Continue reading Carran & Carran

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Carran & Carran [2022] FedCFamC2F 818
Case
[2022] FedCFamC2F 818
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The court was asked to determine whether a financial agreement executed between the parties during their marriage, but purportedly made under section 90B instead of section 90C of the Family Law Act, was binding and enforceable. The court was also asked to consider whether the agreement should be set aside due to uncertainty, a material change in circumstances, or unconscionable conduct. The court found that the agreement was uncertain and thus void, and that the Wife would suffer hardship if the agreement was not set aside. The court set aside the agreement and dismissed certain applications made by the parties during the proceedings. The parties were invited to make submissions on the future disposition of the matter.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.