QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Campagnolo v Bennett No 2 [2020] QCAT 68
PARTIES:
DONNA CAMPAGNOLO
(applicant)v JESSE SEABROOK BENNETT
(respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
BDL144-18
MATTER TYPE:
Building matters
DELIVERED ON:
10 March 2020
HEARING DATE:
On the papers
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Member King-Scott
ORDERS:
The Tribunal orders:
1. Jesse Seabrook Bennett pay Donna Campagnolo the sum of $220,000.00 in respect of her claim;
2. Jesse Seabrook Bennett’s counter-application is dismissed;
3. Jesse Seabrook Bennett pay Donna Campagnolo her costs fixed in the sum of $89,592.90.
4. The said sums to be paid by 4:00 pm 17 April 2020.
CATCHWORDS:
PROCEDURE – CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS – COSTS – GENERAL MATTERS – OTHER MATTERS – domestic building dispute – where parties legally represented – where respondent substantially successful at hearing – where respondent sought order for costs – where respondent made offer to settle – whether discretion to award costs should be exercised
Queensland Building & Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld)
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2009 (Qld)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999A L Builders Pty Ltd v Nicholas Fatseas and Tricia Fatseas (No 2) [2014] QCATA 319
Colburt v Beard (1992) 2 Qd R 67
Lyons v Dreamstarter Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 71
Ricchetti and Ors v Lanbuilt Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 111APPEARANCES:
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld).
REASONS FOR DECISION
This matter was heard in Cairns on 16 October 2019. On 24 January 2020 the following orders were made:
(a)I order Jesse Seabrook Bennett pay Donna Campagnolo the sum of $220,000.00 in respect of her claim;
(b)I dismiss Jesse Seabrook Bennett’s counter-application;
(c)The order to pay is stayed until further argument in relation to costs and the form of final orders;
(d)I invite the parties to make submissions in relation to costs;
(e)I direct the parties file written submissions, if any, as to costs as follows:
(i) Donna Campagnolo by 4.00 pm 7 February 2020;
(ii) Jesse Seabrook Bennett by 4.00 pm 14 February 2020.
The Applicant, Donna Campagnolo has filed submissions and made a claim for costs. The Respondent, Jesse Seabrook Bennett, has responded but has not made any submissions other than to request a reasonable time to pay.
Section 100 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 provides that each party should bear their own costs unless otherwise provided such as under an enabling act.
Section 77 of the Queensland Building & Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld) displaces the usual order in Tribunal proceedings.[1] The general rule about costs is thereby incorporated into building disputes before the Tribunal.[2] The general rule is that a successful party is entitled to procure its costs against the other party. That is, costs should follow the event. That might not be appropriate in some instances, such as the delinquent behaviour of the winning…
Continue reading Campagnolo v Bennett No 2
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Campagnolo v Bennett No 2 [2020] QCAT 68
- Case
- [2020] QCAT 68
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the discretion to award costs should be exercised in favour of Campagnolo, despite Bennett's offer to settle. The Tribunal had to consider the offer in the context of the respondent's substantial success at the hearing and the nature of the offer, including whether it was made in good faith and whether it was genuinely intended to resolve the dispute.
The Tribunal determined that the offer to settle was not made in good faith and did not represent a genuine attempt to resolve the dispute. Consequently, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to award costs in favour of Campagnolo, reflecting the respondent's substantial success and the lack of a genuine settlement offer. The Tribunal fixed the costs at $89,592.90, which Campagnolo was to receive.
The Tribunal also ordered Bennett to pay Campagnolo $220,000 in respect of her claim and dismissed Bennett's counter-application. The payment was to be made by 4:00 pm on 17 April 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal orders:
1. Jesse Seabrook Bennett pay Donna Campagnolo the sum of $220,000.00 in respect of her claim;
2. Jesse Seabrook Bennett’s counter-application is dismissed;
3. Jesse Seabrook Bennett pay Donna Campagnolo her costs fixed in the sum of $89,592.90.
4. The said sums to be paid by 4:00 pm 17 April 2020.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.