Building Professionals Board v Hans

Case [2008] NSWADTAP 13


Appeal Panel - Internal

CITATION: Building Professionals Board v Hans (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 13
PARTIES:

APPELLANT
Building Professionals Board

RESPONDENT
Anthony Hans
FILE NUMBER: 079025
HEARING DATES: 3 September 2007, 21 November 2007
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 21 November 2007
 
DATE OF DECISION: 

12 March 2008
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Salier GA - Judicial Member; Hayward P - Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Leave to extend to the merits - admission of further evidence
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
DECISION UNDER APPEAL: Building Professionals Board v Hans [2007] NSWADT 83
FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 063382
DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 04/12/2007
LEGISLATION CITED: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Legal Profession Act 1987
Retail Leases Act 1994
CASES CITED: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336
CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172; [1998] HCA 67
Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (No 2) [2002] NSWADTAP 6
Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge [2000] NSWADTAP 5
Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Knight [2000] NSWADTAP 6
Coulter v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 359
Council of the City of Greater Wollongong v Cowan (1955) 93 CLR 435
Law Society of New South Wales v Young (No 2) (LSD) [2001] NSWADTAP 19
Lloyd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd & Anor [1999] NSWADTAP 3
Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee [2005] NSWCA 456
Stanoevski v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2005] NSWCA 428
Turnbull v NSW Medical Board [1976] 2 NSWLR 281
World Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker & Anor [2004] NSWSC 935
REPRESENTATION:

APPELLANT
P Lakatos SC, barrister

RESPONDENT
In person
ORDERS: 1. Leave is granted, on the application of the Appellant, for this appeal to extend to a review of the merits
2. Leave is granted, on the application of the Appellant, for further evidence placed by it before the Appeal Panel on 3 September 2007 to be adduced at the hearing of the appeal
3. The appeal is set down for further directions at a date and time to be fixed by the Registry in consultation with the parties.

    REASONS FOR DECISION

    Introduction

    1 This decision deals with applications by the Appellant, the Building Professionals Board (hereafter ‘the Board’), for orders granting leave for the appeal to extend to the merits of the decision under appeal and for further evidence to be adduced by the Board. The question requiring closest consideration is whether sufficient grounds for admitting further evidence have been advanced.

    2 On 27 October 2006, the Board filed a disciplinary application in the Tribunal under section 109Z(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (‘the EPA Act’), naming Mr Hans, who is an accredited certifier under Part 4B of this Act, as respondent. While the provisions of the EPA Act relating to disciplinary applications are no longer in force, it is common ground that they apply to the present proceedings.

    3 In the decision under appeal, which was delivered on 12 April…

Continue reading Building Professionals Board v Hans

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Building Professionals Board v Hans [2008] NSWADTAP 13
Case
[2008] NSWADTAP 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves an appeal by Building Professionals Board against a decision of the Professional Standards Tribunal of the Building Professionals Board. The dispute revolves around the admissibility of further evidence and the granting of leave for the appeal to extend to a review of the merits. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether leave should be granted for the appeal to extend to a review of the merits and if additional evidence could be presented. The Appellant argued that the Tribunal had overlooked crucial evidence and that the appeal should be allowed to proceed to a merits review. The Respondent, on the other hand, contended that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate a compelling reason to deviate from the usual practice of not extending appeals to the merits and that the additional evidence should not be admitted.

The court granted leave for the appeal to extend to a review of the merits, acknowledging that the Appellant had presented a strong case for the Tribunal to have reconsidered certain evidence. The court found that the Appellant had demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits, which justified the appeal being extended. Furthermore, the court allowed the additional evidence to be adduced at the hearing of the appeal, concluding that the evidence was relevant and could not have been reasonably obtained earlier. The appeal was subsequently set down for further directions, to be arranged by the Registry in consultation with the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave is granted, on the application of the Appellant, for this appeal to extend to a review of the merits 2. Leave is granted, on the application of the Appellant, for further evidence placed by it before the Appeal Panel on 3 September 2007 to be adduced at the hearing of the appeal 3. The appeal is set down for further directions at a date and time to be fixed by the Registry in consultation with the parties.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.