DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: | |
PARTIES: | MARK ANDREW BROWN (Appellant) AND RONALD OWEN (Respondent) |
FILE NO/S: | 10 of 2004 |
DIVISION: | Civil |
PROCEEDING: | Appeal |
ORIGINATING COURT: | Magistrates Court at Gympie |
DELIVERED ON: | 4 March 2005 |
DELIVERED AT: | Maroochydore |
HEARING DATE: | 8 February 2005 |
JUDGE: | Judge J.M. Robertson |
ORDER: | [1] Application to strike out appeal dismissed. [2] The appeal is allowed. The respondent to pay the appellant's costs, but as the appeal has succeeded on a question of law, I grant to him an indemnity certificate in respect of the appeal pursuant to s15(3) of the Appeal Costs Funds Act 1973. [3] The complaints are to be listed for mention at a time and date to be fixed in the Gympie Magistrates Court to be determined according to law. |
CATCHWORDS: | Justices Act and Practice Directions - application to strike out, failure to comply with direction to make disclosure and provide particulars, delay in prosecuting appeal, s222 appeal, whether Magistrate had power to dismiss complaints on grounds that the prosecutor had not complied with a direction to provide brief and particulars. Cases cited: Gamble v Davidson [1998] ACA 154 Steinberg v Lundgaard [2001] QCA 332 Double Time Pty Ltd v Ryan [2002] 1 Qd R 371 R v The Judge of the District Court at Brisbane and Davies; ex parte Allen [1969] Qd R 114 Von Schulz v Durrant [2000] QCA 235 Commissioner of the Police Service v Lyn & anor [2004] QSC 56 Legislation: Ss 83A, 146, 147, 149, 222, 229(1) Justices Act 1886 S 28A the District Court Act 1967 S 15(3) Appeal Costs Fund Act 1973 Chapter 62, Chapter Division 3 the Criminal Code Act 1899 Rule 7 Criminal Practice Rules 1990 Practice Direction No. 5 of 2001 |
COUNSEL: | A. Kimmins (for the appellant) F. Martin (for the respondent) |
SOLICITORS: | Queensland Police Service Solicitor (for the appellant) Roberts and Kuskie Solicitors (for the respondent) |
On 12 July 2000, Mr Ronald Owen was charged with 324 offences against the Weapons Act 1990, and 166 offences of fraudulent false accounting against s. 441 of the Criminal Code. All offences arose out of transactions associated with the Government buy back scheme for weapons.
The indictable offences were eventually tried from 6 October to 28 October 2003 before His Honour Judge McGill SC and a jury in Gympie, and Mr Owen and his co-accused Anthony Cleaver were acquitted of all charges. The summary offences had been mentioned on numerous occasions in the Gympie Magistrates Court and were held over pending the disposition of the indictable offences.
The first mention of the summary matters in the Magistrates Court after the acquittal was on 7 November 2003. Mr Owen’s solicitor Mr Kuskie informed the Magistrate Mr Johnstone that the identical charges against Mr Cleaver had been discontinued and he expected a similar outcome for his client. The police prosecutor told Mr Johnstone that she was not sure whether the charges would…
Continue reading Brown v Owen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Brown v Owen [2005] QDC 40
- Case
- [2005] QDC 40
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues that the court was required to decide were whether the Magistrate had the power to dismiss the complaints without a hearing and whether the appeal could proceed despite the delay and non-compliance with directions. The court also needed to consider the implications of the Justices Act and Practice Directions on the appeal process, specifically in relation to the dismissal of complaints due to non-compliance with disclosure requirements.
The court concluded that the Magistrate did not have the power to dismiss the complaints without a hearing, and the appeal could proceed despite the delay and non-compliance with directions. The appeal was allowed, and the complaints were to be listed for mention in the Gympie Magistrates Court to be determined according to law. The respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's costs, and an indemnity certificate was granted to the appellant for the appeal costs pursuant to section 15(3) of the Appeal Costs Funds Act 1973.
Orders
Orders of the court
[1] Application to strike out appeal dismissed.
[2] The appeal is allowed. The respondent to pay the appellant's costs, but as the appeal has succeeded on a question of law, I grant to him an indemnity certificate in respect of the appeal pursuant to s15(3) of the Appeal Costs Funds Act 1973.
[3] The complaints are to be listed for mention at a time and date to be fixed in the Gympie Magistrates Court to be determined according to law.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.