FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Barkla v Colbran [2015] FCA 1470
Citation: Barkla v Colbran [2015] FCA 1470 Parties: GEOFF BARKLA v NICOLA COLBRAN File numbers: SAD 403 of 2015
SAD 410 of 2015
SAD 416 of 2015Judge: BESANKO J Date of judgment: 21 December 2015 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for judicial review of the District Registrar’s decision not to accept the applicant’s originating application and affidavit for filing – application for judicial review of the District Registrar’s decision not to accept the applicant’s information and summons for filing – where the applicant claimed the District Registrar acted fraudulently, dishonestly and in abuse of public office by not accepting the documents – whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear the application and issue the information and summons the applicant sought to file – Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – information and summons issued by the applicant against the District Registrar in relation to the District Registrar’s decisions not to accept applicant’s documents for filing – whether the Court has jurisdiction to issue the information and summons – whether the proceeding is without merit and is an abuse of process – Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01.
Held: Proceedings dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A(1)
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.40, 2.26, 12.01, 26.01, 31.01
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39BCases cited: Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Limited [2010] FCAFC 47 Date of hearing: 18 December 2015 Place: Adelaide Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 20 Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent entered Submitting Notices in SAD 403 of 2015 and SAD 410 of 2015
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
SAD 403 of 2015
BETWEEN: GEOFF BARKLA
ApplicantAND: NICOLA COLBRAN
Respondent
JUDGE:
BESANKO J
DATE OF ORDER:
21 DECEMBER 2015
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The proceeding be dismissed.
2.Any application for costs by the District Registrar to be made within 21 days.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
SAD 410 of 2015
BETWEEN: GEOFF BARKLA
ApplicantAND: NICOLA COLBRAN
Respondent
JUDGE:
BESANKO J
DATE OF ORDER:
21 DECEMBER 2015
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The proceeding be dismissed.
2.Any application for costs by the District Registrar to be made within 21 days.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
SAD 416 of 2015
BETWEEN: GEOFF BARKLA
ApplicantAND: NICOLA COLBRAN
Respondent
JUDGE:
BESANKO J
DATE OF ORDER:
21 DECEMBER 2015
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The proceeding be dismissed.
Note:…
Continue reading Barkla v Colbran
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Barkla v Colbran [2015] FCA 1470
- Case
- [2015] FCA 1470
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to address whether it had jurisdiction under the Federal Court Rules 2011 to hear the application and issue the summons. Additionally, the court considered whether the proceeding was an abuse of process and without merit, as per Rule 26.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. The applicant's claims against the District Registrar were evaluated to determine if they warranted judicial intervention.
The court dismissed the proceeding, finding that the application did not meet the jurisdictional requirements of the Federal Court. The court held that the proceeding was without merit and an abuse of process, thus affirming the District Registrar's decision not to accept the applicant's documents for filing. The court's decision was based on the applicant's failure to establish a valid legal basis for the claims made against the District Registrar. The applicant was also ordered to pay the District Registrar's costs within 21 days, as per Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The proceeding be dismissed.
2. Any application for costs by the District Registrar to be made within 21 days.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
1. The proceeding be dismissed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.