Ayre v Swan

Case [2019] NSWCA 202


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

  • Summary available
Medium Neutral Citation: Ayre v Swan [2019] NSWCA 202
Hearing dates: 24 June 2019
Decision date: 16 August 2019
Before: Basten JA at [1];
Macfarlan JA at [56];
McCallum JA at [57]
Decision:

(1)   Appeal allowed in part.

 

(2)   Set aside the primary judge’s determination as to contributory negligence and in lieu thereof assess the contributory negligence of the plaintiff at 80%.

 

(3)   Set aside the judgment of the District Court and in lieu thereof enter judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $122,947.

 (4)   Order that the respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.
Catchwords:

TORTS – negligence – road accident – liability of defendant – defendant completing a right-hand turn across double on-coming lanes – visibility of plaintiff’s motorcycle blocked by car in front – plaintiff sought to overtake car at a high speed on inside lane – collided with defendant – whether defendant negligent in failing to slow down or stop – reasonableness of precautions against unseen vehicles travelling at high speeds – expectation that road users will take reasonable care for their own safety

  EXPERT EVIDENCE – negligence – calculation of speed – CCTV footage of accident – failure to assess weight of expert evidence – confirmatory report not taken into account
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5R, 54
Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 126, 138
Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), s 117
Cases Cited: Allianz v Cervantes [2012] NSWCA 244
Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; [2001] HCA 29
Gordon v Truong [2014] NSWCA 97; (2016) 66 MVR 241
Nominal Defendant v Livaja [2011] NSWCA 121
Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201
Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALJR 492
Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330; [2007] HCA 42
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Vicki Babette Ayre (Appellant)
Mitchell Richard Swan (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr P Deakin QC / Ms N Compton (Appellant)
Mr M Cranitch SC / Mr F Austin (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Appellant)
Byrnes Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/8079
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
District Court
Jurisdiction:
Civil
Date of Decision:
14 December 2018
Before:
Yehia SC DCJ
File Number(s):
2014/150247

headnote

[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]

On 18 June 2012 the defendant, Ms Ayre, was travelling north-west on Lake Road, Port Macquarie. Ms Ayre sought to make a right-hand turn into a commercial driveway. There was oncoming traffic, relevantly a car driven by Mr Michael Smith and a motorcycle driving by the plaintiff, Mr Swan. Mr Swan was travelling behind Mr Smith so that Ms Ayre’s view of the motorcycle was entirely obscured by Mr Smith’s vehicle. Ms Ayre commenced her right-hand turn without coming to a complete stop. As Ms Ayre was undertaking her turn, Mr Swan increased his…

Continue reading Ayre v Swan

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Ayre v Swan [2019] NSWCA 202
Case
[2019] NSWCA 202
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal in *Ayre v Swan* concerned a road accident involving a collision between the appellant, Mr Swan, and the respondent, Mr Ayre. Mr Ayre was completing a right-hand turn across double oncoming lanes when his vehicle was struck by Mr Swan's motorcycle. Mr Swan had been attempting to overtake a car in front of him at high speed in the inside lane, and his view of Mr Ayre's vehicle was obstructed by that car. The dispute centred on the apportionment of liability for the accident.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether Mr Ayre was negligent in failing to slow down or stop when making his turn, and whether he had taken reasonable precautions against the risk of unseen vehicles travelling at high speeds. Additionally, the court considered the reasonableness of expecting other road users to take reasonable care for their own safety in such circumstances. The court also had to assess the weight to be given to expert evidence regarding the calculation of speed, particularly in light of CCTV footage and a confirmatory report that had not been fully taken into account by the primary judge.

The Court of Appeal found that while Mr Ayre was negligent in failing to ensure his path was clear before turning, Mr Swan's conduct was the primary cause of the accident. The court reasoned that Mr Swan's decision to overtake at high speed in an obstructed lane demonstrated a significant lack of reasonable care for his own safety. The court therefore set aside the primary judge's finding on contributory negligence and assessed Mr Swan's contributory negligence at 80%.

Consequently, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the judgment of the District Court and entering judgment for Mr Swan in the amount of $122,947. The court also ordered that Mr Ayre pay Mr Swan's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Appeal allowed in part.

(2) Set aside the primary judge’s determination as to contributory negligence and in lieu thereof assess the contributory negligence of the plaintiff at 80%.

(3) Set aside the judgment of the District Court and in lieu thereof enter judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $122,947.

(4) Order that the respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.