TRADE MARKS ACT 1995
DECISION OF A DELEGATE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS WITH REASONS
Re:International Registration Designating Australia numbers 2323895 (International Registration number 1703598) – AUTOMATEPRO – and 2324026 (International Registration number 1703907) – AUTOMATEPRO (Figurative) – (classes 9, 41 and 42) both in the name of Automatepro Limited
Delegate:
Sheona Robertson
Representation:
Holder: Kate Duckworth of Kate Duckworth Intellectual Property Limited
Decision:
2023 ATMO 212
Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth) – Regulation 17A.24 – consideration of sections 41 and 44 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – ground(s) for rejecting the IRDAs exist – IRDA 2323895 rejected, IRDA 2324026 rejected in respect of all goods and some services
Background
1. This matter is pursuant to reg 17A.24 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth) (‘Regulations’) involving applications for extension of protection to Australia of the following International Registrations Designating Australia (together, ‘Trade Marks’):
International Registration Designating Australia (‘IRDA’) No.
2323895
2324026
International Registration (‘IR’) No.
1703598
1703907
Trade Mark:
AUTOMATEPRO
(‘Word Trade Mark’)
(‘Figurative Trade Mark’)
Filing Date:
21 September 2022
21 September 2022
Priority Date:
6 September 2022
21 September 2022
Holder:
Automatepro Limited (‘Holder’)
Goods and Services:
(together, ‘Holder’s Goods and Services’)
Class 9: Computer software; downloadable electronic publications; computer databases; computer programs, computer software development tools; downloadable computer software implementation tools; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods included in this Class.
Class 41: The provision of training, provision of information in the field of training; training courses; instructional and teaching services; arranging and organising of seminars, courses, conferences, exhibitions, demonstrations, lectures, educational and instructional events; publication of electronic instructional material, electronic books or journals online or via a global computer network; training and practical demonstrations; tuition, arranging and conducting of workshops; providing sound, video or media recordings online or via a global computer network; educational information services provided online from a computer database or the internet; digital media provided online from a computer database or the internet; providing certification training; all the aforesaid provided via online databases in connection with all the aforesaid services;[1] advice, information and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services.
Class 42: The development and updating of software; design and development of computer software; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for database management; hosting of websites; creating websites; design and development of websites; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software development tools for others; computer software maintenance; infrastructure services featuring computer software platforms for creating, managing and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services; platform-as- a-service (PaaS) services; software as a service (SaaS) services; application service provider (ASP) services; cloud-hosting provider services; information technology integration services; providing information in the field of information technology via a website; computer aided scientific research services provided from computer systems and the internet; designing, developing, configuring, customizing, testing, assessing, implementing and maintaining computer…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Automatepro Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] ATMO 212
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to consider whether the applications for IRD 2323895 and IRD 2324026 should be rejected, specifically in light of sections 41 and 44 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) and Regulation 17A.24 of the *Trade Marks Regulations 1995* (Cth).
The court found that grounds for rejection did exist. IRD 2323895 was rejected in its entirety. IRD 2324026 was also rejected, but only in respect of certain specified services, while potentially remaining valid for other goods and services.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.