[2016] FWCD 5704
DECISION
| Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 | |
| s.159—Alteration of other rules of organisation | |
| The Australian Workers Union | |
| (R2016/159) | |
| MR BILL STEENSON | SYDNEY, 17 AUGUST 2016 |
| Alteration of other rules of organisation. |
[1] On 10 August 2016 The Australian Workers Union (‘the organisation’) lodged with
the Fair Work Commission a notice and declaration setting out particulars of alterations to the
rules of the organisation.
[2] The particulars set out alterations to rules 7, 26, 32, 33, 35, 42, 47, 55, 61 and 82 of the
rules of the organisation.
[3] On the information contained in the notice, I am satisfied the alterations have been
made under the rules of the organisation.
[4] On 15 August 2016 the organisation gave consent, under subsection 159(2) of the Fair
Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, for the Delegate to make amendments to the
alterations for the purpose of correcting typographical, clerical or formal errors, as set out in
Attachment A.
[5] In my opinion, the alterations comply with and are not contrary to the Fair Work
(Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards and enterprise
agreements, and are not otherwise contrary to law. I certify accordingly under subsection
159(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.
DELEGATE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR584226>
PR584226
ATTACHMENT A
1) The reference “55(4)” at paragraph 21 of the Notice of particulars corrected to
“55(5)”
2) The words “Central Coast” inserted immediately after the word “Newcastle” in sub-
rule 82(1)(a)
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union, the [2016] FWCD 5704
- Case
- [2016] FWCD 5704
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the alterations to the Union's rules were made in accordance with the Union's own rules, and whether they were consistent with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards and enterprise agreements, and were not otherwise contrary to law. The Union had given consent for the Delegate to correct any typographical, clerical, or formal errors in the alterations.
After reviewing the application and the alterations, the Delegate found that the changes had been made in accordance with the Union's own rules. Additionally, the Delegate was satisfied that the alterations complied with the relevant legislation and awards, and were not otherwise contrary to law. The Delegate made some minor amendments to the alterations to correct typographical and clerical errors, as set out in Attachment A of the decision. The Delegate then certified the alterations under subsection 159(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.
In conclusion, the court certified that the alterations to the Australian Workers' Union's rules were made in accordance with the Union's own rules, and complied with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards and enterprise agreements, and were not otherwise contrary to law. The Delegate also made minor amendments to the alterations to correct typographical and clerical errors.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.